Li Jingjia, West Jason B, Hart Alexander, Wegrzyn Jill L, Smith Matthew A, Domec Jean-Christophe, Loopstra Carol A, Casola Claudio
Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Front Genet. 2021 May 31;12:661440. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.661440. eCollection 2021.
Drought response is coordinated through expression changes in a large suite of genes. Interspecific variation in this response is common and associated with drought-tolerant and -sensitive genotypes. The extent to which different genetic networks orchestrate the adjustments to water deficit in tolerant and sensitive genotypes has not been fully elucidated, particularly in non-model or woody plants. Differential expression analysis via RNA-seq was evaluated in root tissue exposed to simulated drought conditions in two loblolly pine ( L.) clones with contrasting tolerance to drought. Loblolly pine is the prevalent conifer in southeastern U.S. and a major commercial forestry species worldwide. Significant changes in gene expression levels were found in more than 4,000 transcripts [drought-related transcripts (DRTs)]. Genotype by environment (GxE) interactions were prevalent, suggesting that different cohorts of genes are influenced by drought conditions in the tolerant vs. sensitive genotypes. Functional annotation categories and metabolic pathways associated with DRTs showed higher levels of overlap between clones, with the notable exception of GO categories in upregulated DRTs. Conversely, both differentially expressed transcription factors (TFs) and TF families were largely different between clones. Our results indicate that the response of a drought-tolerant loblolly pine genotype vs. a sensitive genotype to water limitation is remarkably different on a gene-by-gene level, although it involves similar genetic networks. Upregulated transcripts under drought conditions represent the most diverging component between genotypes, which might depend on the activation and repression of substantially different groups of TFs.
干旱响应是通过大量基因的表达变化来协调的。这种响应中的种间变异很常见,并且与耐旱和敏感基因型相关。不同的遗传网络在多大程度上协调耐旱和敏感基因型对水分亏缺的适应尚未完全阐明,特别是在非模式植物或木本植物中。通过RNA测序进行的差异表达分析在暴露于模拟干旱条件下的两种耐旱性不同的火炬松(L.)无性系的根组织中进行评估。火炬松是美国东南部常见的针叶树,也是全球主要的商业林业树种。在4000多个转录本[干旱相关转录本(DRT)]中发现了基因表达水平的显著变化。基因型与环境(GxE)相互作用普遍存在,这表明耐旱和敏感基因型中不同的基因群受到干旱条件的影响。与DRT相关的功能注释类别和代谢途径在无性系之间显示出较高的重叠水平,但上调的DRT中的GO类别除外。相反,差异表达的转录因子(TF)和TF家族在无性系之间大多不同。我们的结果表明,耐旱火炬松基因型与敏感基因型对水分限制的响应在逐个基因水平上存在显著差异,尽管它们涉及相似的遗传网络。干旱条件下上调的转录本是基因型之间差异最大的组成部分,这可能取决于不同TF组的激活和抑制。