Liu He, Shen Ya, Wang Zhejun, Haapasalo Markus
Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Shandong, China.
Division of Endodontics, Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, 2199 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Odontology. 2022 Jan;110(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00628-x. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
The purpose is to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation techniques in the removal of various calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)] and barium sulfate [BaSO] formulations from three isthmuses in 3-dimensional (3D) printed molar root canal models. 3D printed transparent models were designed, fabricated, and filled with pure Ca(OH) paste, Ca(OH)-BaSO 8:1 paste, Ca(OH)-BaSO 1:1 paste, pure BaSO paste, all in water, and Diapaste. Open-ended needle irrigation (ONI) at 5 and 15 mL/min, double-side-vented needle irrigation (DNI) at 5 mL/min, the GentleWave system (GW), PiezoFlow (PF), and passive ultrasonic activation (PUI) with distilled water, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 3% NaOCl were used to remove the materials from the isthmuses. Ninety groups (n = 10) were established. The removal time was recorded from the start of irrigation to the completion of removal. GW and PF were the only methods that removed all tested materials from the isthmuses. PF required 2-3 × as much time as GW for complete removal, depending on the BaSO content of the paste. ONI at 15 mL/min removed pure Ca(OH) paste, Ca(OH)-BaSO (8:1) paste, Ca(OH)-BaSO (1:1) completely but could not completely remove pure BaSO paste and Diapaste. PUI with intermittent needle irrigation, ONI, and DNI at 5 mL/min were not able to completely remove any of the materials within 7.5 min. The GW removed all materials faster than PF, whereas other methods failed to remove all materials from the isthmuses. Pure Ca(OH) and the mixture with BaSO paste in the proportion 8:1 were removed in less time than the other mixtures by the GW, PF and ONI systems, the latter only when using 15 mL/min flow rate.
目的是评估不同冲洗技术在从三维(3D)打印的磨牙根管模型的三个峡部去除各种氢氧化钙[Ca(OH)]和硫酸钡[BaSO]制剂的效果。设计、制作了3D打印的透明模型,并分别用纯Ca(OH)糊剂、Ca(OH)-BaSO 8:1糊剂、Ca(OH)-BaSO 1:1糊剂、纯BaSO糊剂(均在水中)以及Diapaste填充。使用5和15 mL/min的开放式针冲洗(ONI)、5 mL/min的双侧通气针冲洗(DNI)、GentleWave系统(GW)、PiezoFlow(PF)以及用蒸馏水、0.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和3% NaOCl进行的被动超声激活(PUI)从峡部去除材料。共设立了90组(n = 10)。记录从冲洗开始到去除完成的时间。GW和PF是仅有的能从峡部去除所有测试材料的方法。PF完全去除所需时间是GW的2 - 3倍,具体取决于糊剂中的BaSO含量。15 mL/min的ONI能完全去除纯Ca(OH)糊剂、Ca(OH)-BaSO(8:1)糊剂、Ca(OH)-BaSO(1:1)糊剂,但不能完全去除纯BaSO糊剂和Diapaste。5 mL/min的间歇性针冲洗、ONI和DNI的PUI在7.5分钟内无法完全去除任何一种材料。GW比PF更快地去除了所有材料,而其他方法未能从峡部去除所有材料。GW、PF和ONI系统(仅在使用15 mL/min流速时)去除纯Ca(OH)以及与BaSO按8:1比例混合的糊剂所需时间比其他混合物更少。