Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 18;16(6):e0253521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253521. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of this review was to systematically analyze the evidence regarding the occurrence of muscle damage (changes in muscle damage markers) after resistance training with blood flow restriction sessions.
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. Two researchers independently and blindly searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS and SPORTdicus. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials which analyzed the effect of resistance training with blood flow restriction on muscle damage markers in humans were included. The risk of bias assessment was performed by two blinded and independent researchers using the RoB2 tool.
A total of 21 studies involving 352 healthy participants (men, n = 301; women, n = 51) were eligible for this review. The samples in 66.6% of the studies (n = 14) were composed of untrained individuals. All included studies analyzed muscle damage using indirect markers. Most studies had more than one muscle damage marker and Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness was the measure most frequently used. The results for the occurrence of significant changes in muscle damage markers after low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction sessions were contrasting, and the use of a pre-defined repetition scheme versus muscle failure seems to be the determining point for this divergence, mainly in untrained individuals.
In summary, the use of sets until failure is seen to be determinant for the occurrence of significant changes in muscle damage markers after low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction sessions, especially in individuals not used to resistance exercise.
Register number: PROSPERO number: CRD42020177119.
本综述的目的是系统分析有关抗阻训练结合血流限制后肌肉损伤(肌肉损伤标志物变化)发生情况的证据。
本系统综述按照 PRISMA 建议进行。两名研究人员独立且盲法检索了以下电子数据库:PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、LILACS 和 SPORTdicus。纳入了分析抗阻训练结合血流限制对人体肌肉损伤标志物影响的随机和非随机临床试验。使用 RoB2 工具由两名盲法和独立的研究人员进行偏倚风险评估。
共有 21 项研究涉及 352 名健康参与者(男性,n = 301;女性,n = 51)符合本综述的纳入标准。66.6%(n = 14)的研究样本由未经训练的个体组成。所有纳入的研究均使用间接标志物分析肌肉损伤。大多数研究使用了不止一种肌肉损伤标志物,迟发性肌肉酸痛是最常使用的测量指标。抗阻训练结合血流限制后低负荷训练发生显著肌肉损伤标志物变化的结果存在差异,使用预定义的重复方案与肌肉力竭似乎是导致这种差异的决定性因素,尤其是在未经训练的个体中。
总之,在抗阻训练结合血流限制后,使用直至力竭的组次似乎是导致低负荷训练发生显著肌肉损伤标志物变化的决定因素,尤其是在不习惯抗阻运动的个体中。
注册号:PROSPERO 号:CRD42020177119。