Suppr超能文献

外固定架治疗双侧桡骨远端骨折:回顾性队列研究。

The external fixation can be a good alternative to plate-screw treatment in the surgical treatment of bilateral distal radius fractures: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Maltepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 34844 Maltepe, İstanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(2):406-413. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.151. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the outcomes of two surgical treatment options, external fixator (EF) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), in patients with bilateral distal radius fractures (DRFs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients (11 males 10 females; mean age: 40.0±16.0 years; range, 20 to 67 years) who underwent ORIF (n=10) or EF (n=11) due to bilateral DRF at between January 2011 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) was used to calculate functional and symptomatic evaluation. The MAYO wrist scores were used to evaluate pain, functional status, ROM, and grip strength and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) was used to measure hand performance in daily life.

RESULTS

The operation time was statistically significantly longer in the ORIF group, compared to the EF group (p<0.001). Radial shortening was statistically significantly greater in the EF group, compared to the ORIF group (p<0.001). While the Q-DASH score was lower in the EF group on Day 15 and at one and two months (p<0.001, for each), it was similar between the groups at one year (p=0.507). The MAYO wrist score was higher in the EF group on Day 15 and at one and two months and one year (p<0.05, for each). While the MHOQ score was higher in the EF group on Day 15 and at one and two months (p<0.001, for each), it was similar between the groups at one year (p=0.557).

CONCLUSION

In bilateral DRF cases, hand functions in the first two months after treatment were better in the EF group, compared to the ORIF group. This functional difference between the two groups gradually decreased in the first year and reached similar levels. Our results demonstrate that EF can be a good alternative in the surgical treatment of bilateral DRFs owing to its acceptable results, particularly in the short-term.

摘要

目的

比较外固定器(EF)与切开复位内固定(ORIF)两种手术治疗双侧桡骨远端骨折(DRF)的疗效。

患者与方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间因双侧 DRF 接受 ORIF(n=10)或 EF(n=11)治疗的 21 例患者(男 11 例,女 10 例;平均年龄 40.0±16.0 岁;范围 20 至 67 岁)。采用简易上肢功能测试(Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand,Q-DASH)评估功能和症状。采用 Mayo 腕关节评分(MAYO wrist scores)评估疼痛、功能状态、ROM 和握力,采用密歇根手功能问卷(Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire,MHOQ)评估日常生活中的手部功能。

结果

ORIF 组的手术时间明显长于 EF 组(p<0.001)。EF 组的桡骨缩短明显大于 ORIF 组(p<0.001)。EF 组在第 15 天和 1、2 个月时 Q-DASH 评分较低(p<0.001,各时间点),但 1 年后两组评分相似(p=0.507)。EF 组在第 15 天和 1、2 个月及 1 年时 Mayo 腕关节评分较高(p<0.05,各时间点)。EF 组在第 15 天和 1、2 个月时 MHOQ 评分较高(p<0.001,各时间点),但 1 年后两组评分相似(p=0.557)。

结论

在双侧 DRF 患者中,与 ORIF 组相比,EF 组在治疗后前 2 个月手部功能更好。两组间的这种功能差异在第 1 年逐渐减小,并达到相似水平。我们的结果表明,EF 可以作为双侧 DRF 手术治疗的一种较好选择,其结果可接受,尤其是在短期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4e6/8343847/f4879ae55782/JDRS-2021-32-2-406-413-F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验