University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, 160 Dental Circle, Campus Box 7075 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7075 USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Sep;33(9):E702-E708. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00632. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
We sought to test the hypothesis that patients undergoing ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) with standard alteplase and heparin dosing would not develop significant depletion of systemic fibrinogen, which may account for the lower risk of bleeding seen in contemporary trials. We also sought to compare the relative outcomes of individuals with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing USAT and anticoagulation alone.
Utilizing a single-center prospective registry, we identified 102 consecutive adult patients with submassive PE who were considered for USAT based on a standardized treatment algorithm between November 2016 and May 2019. Patients not receiving USAT therapy were treated with anticoagulation alone.
Baseline characteristics were generally similar between groups (n = 51 in each group). Major bleeding rates were not significantly different between groups (2.0% vs 5.9% in USAT vs control, respectively; P=.62). Notably, no USAT patient experienced clinically significant hypofibrinogenemia (mean trough fibrinogen, 369.8 ± 127.1 mg/dL; minimum, 187 mg/dL). The mean trough fibrinogen of patients experiencing any bleeding event (major or minor) was 306.6 mg/dL (SE, 23.9 mg/dL) vs 380.3 mg/dL (SE, 20.4 mg/dL) in those without a bleeding event (P=.02).
In this cohort analysis of patients undergoing USAT, there was no evidence for clinically significant depletion of fibrinogen or intracranial hemorrhage. Although our data suggest an association between lower fibrinogen levels and bleeding events, our results are not clear enough to suggest a clinically useful fibrinogen cut-off value. Further study is needed to determine the utility of routine fibrinogen monitoring in this population.
我们旨在验证以下假设,即接受超声辅助导管溶栓(USAT)联合标准剂量阿替普酶和肝素治疗的患者不会出现明显的全身纤维蛋白原耗竭,这可能是与当代试验中较低的出血风险相关。我们还旨在比较接受 USAT 联合抗凝治疗与单独抗凝治疗的亚大块肺栓塞(PE)患者的相对结局。
我们利用单中心前瞻性登记研究,纳入了 2016 年 11 月至 2019 年 5 月期间根据标准化治疗算法考虑接受 USAT 的 102 例连续成年亚大块 PE 患者。未接受 USAT 治疗的患者接受单独抗凝治疗。
两组患者的基线特征总体相似(每组 51 例)。两组大出血发生率无显著差异(USAT 组为 2.0%,对照组为 5.9%;P=.62)。值得注意的是,无 USAT 患者发生有临床意义的纤维蛋白原减少(平均纤维蛋白原水平为 369.8±127.1mg/dL;最低值为 187mg/dL)。发生任何出血事件(主要或次要)的患者的平均纤维蛋白原水平为 306.6mg/dL(SE,23.9mg/dL),而无出血事件的患者为 380.3mg/dL(SE,20.4mg/dL)(P=.02)。
在这项接受 USAT 的患者队列分析中,没有证据表明纤维蛋白原明显耗竭或颅内出血。尽管我们的数据表明纤维蛋白原水平与出血事件之间存在关联,但我们的结果还不够明确,无法提示一个有临床意义的纤维蛋白原截断值。需要进一步研究来确定在该人群中常规纤维蛋白原监测的效用。