Kelley Jane M, Rawlin Grant, Beddoe Travis, Stevenson Mark, Spithill Terry W
Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Department of Jobs Precincts and Regions, Agriculture Victoria Research, Centre for AgriBioscience, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 4;8:669117. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.669117. eCollection 2021.
In Australia, little is known about the strategies used by farmers to control () infection in dairy cattle. Triclabendazole-resistant have recently been found on several dairy and beef properties in Australia. It is difficult to draw conclusions about how widespread resistance is in Australian dairy cattle because we have little information about flukicide usage, drug resistance testing, and alternative flukicide usage on-farm. The study objectives were to determine how dairy farmers are currently controlling and to identify knowledge gaps where control strategies need to be communicated to farmers to improve management. The survey was distributed online or by hard copy and 36 dairy farmers completed the survey. There were 34 questions including closed, open-ended, multicheck box, demographic, and text questions. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify each response. The survey results showed high use of clorsulon, limited rotation of flukicides, and limited use of diagnostic tests to inform treatment options and timing. There was poor adherence to best management practice in determining the dose of flukicides administered to cattle, with farmers often relying on estimating body weights or average body weights, suggesting that underdosing of animals is likely to be prevalent. Most respondents in this study did not isolate and quarantine treated and newly returned or purchased animals before joining them with the main herd. The research identified four knowledge gaps where communication needs to be enhanced to improve control of : diagnostic testing to inform flukicide use, rotation of flukicide actives, flukicide administration, and increased testing of replacement animals.
在澳大利亚,人们对奶农控制奶牛体内()感染所采用的策略知之甚少。最近在澳大利亚的几个奶牛场和肉牛场发现了对三氯苯达唑耐药的()。由于我们几乎没有关于杀吸虫剂使用情况、耐药性检测以及农场替代杀吸虫剂使用情况的信息,因此很难就澳大利亚奶牛耐药情况的普遍程度得出结论。研究目的是确定奶农目前如何控制(),并找出在哪些知识空白领域需要向奶农传达控制策略以改善管理。该调查通过网络或纸质版发放,36位奶农完成了调查。共有34个问题,包括封闭式、开放式、多选框式、人口统计学以及文本类问题。采用描述性统计对每个回答进行量化。调查结果显示,氯舒隆的使用频率很高,杀吸虫剂的轮换使用有限,用于指导治疗方案和时间安排的诊断检测使用也有限。在确定给牛使用杀吸虫剂的剂量方面,对最佳管理实践的遵循情况较差,奶农通常依靠估计体重或平均体重,这表明动物用药不足的情况可能很普遍。在本研究中,大多数受访者在将接受治疗以及新返回或新购买来的动物与主要牛群合群之前,没有对其进行隔离检疫。该研究确定了四个需要加强沟通以改善()控制的知识空白领域:用于指导杀吸虫剂使用的诊断检测、杀吸虫剂活性成分的轮换、杀吸虫剂的施用以及增加对替代动物的检测。