van 't Wout Demy
Brussels, Belgium.
Asia Eur J. 2022;20(2):81-98. doi: 10.1007/s10308-021-00627-1. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
Since 2011, the European Union's (EU) free trade agreements (FTAs) include a Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapter which provides for environmental and labour commitments. Nevertheless, the ratification and implementation of these commitments remain insufficient. It is therefore essential to analyse whether the EU has become more ambitious in enforcing the TSD chapter. To analyse the chapter's enforceability, the EU's FTAs with South Korea, Canada and Japan have been compared. The comparative analysis was based on three elements: the labour and environmental commitments, institutional mechanisms and the enforcement procedure. Concerning the latter, the ongoing EU-Korea dispute settlement case over workers' rights in South Korea is the leading example. Until the Commission reveals more assertive enforcement plans, it can be said that the EU has not become more ambitious in enforcing its TSD chapter. Since no major changes were detected in the comparative analysis, several interviewees proposed enforcement mechanisms.
自2011年以来,欧盟(EU)的自由贸易协定(FTA)包含一个贸易与可持续发展(TSD)章节,其中规定了环境和劳工方面的承诺。然而,这些承诺的批准和实施仍然不够充分。因此,分析欧盟在执行TSD章节方面是否变得更加雄心勃勃至关重要。为了分析该章节的可执行性,对欧盟与韩国、加拿大和日本签订的自由贸易协定进行了比较。比较分析基于三个要素:劳工和环境承诺、体制机制以及执行程序。关于后者,正在进行的欧盟-韩国关于韩国工人权利的争端解决案件就是主要例子。在欧盟委员会公布更坚定的执行计划之前,可以说欧盟在执行其TSD章节方面并没有变得更加雄心勃勃。由于在比较分析中未发现重大变化,一些受访者提出了执行机制。