Suppr超能文献

农村社区药房对新冠疫情的准备及应对措施

Rural community pharmacies' preparedness for and responses to COVID-19.

作者信息

Carpenter Delesha M, Hastings Tessa, Westrick Salisa, Rosenthal Meagen, Mashburn Patricia, Kiser Stephanie, Shepherd J Greene, Curran Geoffrey

机构信息

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jul;17(7):1327-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have documented rural community pharmacy disaster preparedness.

OBJECTIVES

To: (1) describe rural community pharmacies' preparedness for and responses to COVID-19 and (2) examine whether responses vary by level of pharmacy rurality.

METHODS

A convenience sample of rural community pharmacists completed an online survey (62% response rate) that assessed: (a) demographic characteristics; (b) COVID-19 information source use; (c) interest in COVID-19 testing; (d) infection control procedures; (e) disaster preparedness training, and (f) medication supply impacts. Descriptive statistics were calculated and differences by pharmacy rurality were explored.

RESULTS

Pharmacists used the CDC (87%), state health departments (77%), and state pharmacy associations (71%) for COVID-19 information, with half receiving conflicting information. Most pharmacists (78%) were interested in offering COVID-19 testing but needed personal protective equipment and training to do so. Only 10% had received disaster preparedness training in the past five years. Although 73% had disaster preparedness plans, 27% were deemed inadequate for the pandemic. Nearly 70% experienced negative impacts in medication supply. There were few differences by rurality level.

CONCLUSION

Rural pharmacies may be better positioned to respond to pandemics if they had disaster preparedness training, updated disaster preparedness plans, and received regular policy guidance from professional bodies.

摘要

背景

很少有研究记录农村社区药房的灾难准备情况。

目的

(1)描述农村社区药房对2019冠状病毒病的准备情况和应对措施;(2)研究应对措施是否因药房的农村程度而异。

方法

对农村社区药剂师进行便利抽样,完成一项在线调查(回复率62%),该调查评估:(a)人口统计学特征;(b)2019冠状病毒病信息来源的使用情况;(c)对2019冠状病毒病检测的兴趣;(d)感染控制程序;(e)灾难准备培训;(f)药品供应影响。计算描述性统计数据,并探讨药房农村程度的差异。

结果

药剂师获取2019冠状病毒病信息的来源包括疾病控制与预防中心(87%)、州卫生部门(77%)和州药房协会(71%),半数药剂师收到相互矛盾的信息。大多数药剂师(78%)有兴趣提供2019冠状病毒病检测,但需要个人防护设备和培训才能开展检测。过去五年中只有10%的药剂师接受过灾难准备培训。虽然73%的药房有灾难准备计划,但27%的计划被认为不足以应对大流行。近70%的药房在药品供应方面受到负面影响。农村程度不同,差异不大。

结论

如果农村药房接受灾难准备培训、更新灾难准备计划并获得专业机构的定期政策指导,它们可能更有能力应对大流行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8414/7577225/2c22be0bfb04/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验