Suppr超能文献

他们所承受的负担:重症监护病房医生同理心的范围综述。

The burden they bear: A scoping review of physician empathy in the intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, USA; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, USA.

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2021 Oct;65:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Research shows that physician empathy can improve patients' reporting of symptoms, participation in care, compliance, and satisfaction; however, success in harnessing these advantages in the ICU hinges on a myriad of contextual factors. This study describes the current state of knowledge about intensivists' empathy.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted across six databases and grey literature to clarify intensivists' experiences of empathy and identify directions of future inquiries. The search had no date limits and was specific to empathy, intensivists, and ICU environments. Results were blindly and independently reviewed by authors.

RESULTS

The search yielded 628 manuscripts; 45 met inclusion criteria. Three overarching themes connected the manuscripts: (1) the risks and benefits of empathy, (2) the spectrum of connection and distance of intensivists from patients/families, and (3) the facilitators and barriers to empathy's development.

CONCLUSION

Empathy among intensivists is not a dichotomous phenomenon. It instead exists on continua. Four steps are recommended for optimizing empathy in the ICU: clearly defining empathy, addressing risks and benefits transparently, providing education regarding reflective practice, and developing supportive environments. Overall, this review revealed that the state of knowledge about empathy as experienced by intensivists still has room to grow and be further explored.

摘要

目的

研究表明,医生的同理心可以提高患者对症状的报告、参与护理、依从性和满意度;然而,要在 ICU 中成功利用这些优势,需要考虑到无数的背景因素。本研究描述了目前关于重症监护医师同理心的知识状况。

方法

通过对六个数据库和灰色文献进行范围综述,以阐明重症监护医师同理心的体验,并确定未来研究的方向。该搜索没有时间限制,且专门针对同理心、重症监护医师和 ICU 环境。作者对结果进行了盲法和独立审查。

结果

搜索共产生了 628 篇手稿;其中 45 篇符合纳入标准。三篇总体主题将这些手稿联系在一起:(1)同理心的风险和益处,(2)重症监护医师与患者/家属之间联系和距离的范围,以及(3)同理心发展的促进因素和障碍。

结论

重症监护医师的同理心不是一个二分法现象。它存在于连续体中。建议在 ICU 中优化同理心的实施采取以下四个步骤:明确界定同理心,透明地处理风险和益处,提供关于反思实践的教育,并营造支持性的环境。总的来说,本综述表明,关于重症监护医师同理心体验的知识状况仍有发展和进一步探索的空间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验