Department of Urology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO.
Section of Urology and VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, Vermont; Section of Urology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH.
Urol Oncol. 2022 Jan;40(1):9.e19-9.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
To evaluate the degree of discomfort among patients with bladder cancer undergoing office-based cystoscopy and identify factors and interventions that influence discomfort and anxiety.
We conducted a survey of the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network (BCAN PSN) to investigate the degree of discomfort associated with office-based cystoscopy and prevalence of interventions used to reduce discomfort. All patients had undergone at least one previous cystoscopy. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with moderate-to-severe cystoscopy discomfort.
Among 488 BCAN PSN respondents (50% response rate), 392 responded with demographic data and discomfort score. Cystoscopy was associated with moderate-to-severe discomfort in 52% of patients. Respondents who reported moderate-to-severe discomfort were more likely to describe their most recent cystoscopy discomfort as worse than prior (P<0.001) and to be interested in planning discomfort mitigation for cystoscopy (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, gender was the only factor independently associated with discomfort, with women reporting less discomfort than men (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.37-0.95,P=0.03). Patients reported a wide variety of cystoscopy-specific interventions with differing perceived effectiveness, the most common being intraurethral lidocaine.
Over half of patients undergoing office-based cystoscopy for bladder cancer report moderate-to-severe discomfort, constituting a substantial problem among patients undergoing the procedure. Future large pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials are needed to better understand which interventions work most effectively to reduce discomfort associated with cystoscopy.
评估膀胱癌患者行门诊膀胱镜检查时的不适程度,并确定影响不适和焦虑的因素及干预措施。
我们对膀胱癌倡导网络患者调查网络(BCAN PSN)进行了一项调查,以调查与门诊膀胱镜检查相关的不适程度以及用于减轻不适的干预措施的流行情况。所有患者均至少接受过一次膀胱镜检查。采用双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与中重度膀胱镜检查不适相关的因素。
在 488 名 BCAN PSN 受访者(50%的回复率)中,有 392 名受访者提供了人口统计学数据和不适评分。52%的患者报告膀胱镜检查存在中重度不适。报告中重度不适的患者更有可能将其最近一次的膀胱镜检查不适描述为比以前更严重(P<0.001),并且对为膀胱镜检查计划减轻不适更感兴趣(P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,性别是唯一与不适相关的独立因素,女性报告的不适程度低于男性(OR 0.59,95%CI 0.37-0.95,P=0.03)。患者报告了各种不同的膀胱镜检查特异性干预措施,这些措施的有效性各不相同,最常见的是尿道内利多卡因。
超过一半的膀胱癌患者行门诊膀胱镜检查时报告存在中重度不适,这是接受该操作的患者中一个相当严重的问题。未来需要开展大型实用比较有效性试验,以更好地了解哪些干预措施最有效地减轻与膀胱镜检查相关的不适。