Suppr超能文献

用于检测新型冠状病毒2的免提取聚合酶链反应检测法的临床实用性。

Clinical usefulness of extraction-free PCR assay to detect SARS-CoV-2.

作者信息

Kim Yu Kyung, Chang Soon Hee

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, School of Medicne, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

Department of Clinical Pathology, School of Medicne, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2021 Oct;296:114217. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114217. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

Abstract

Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the demand for an easily accessible high-throughput screening test is increasing. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the extrac-tion-free polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a screening test to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Real-time reverse transcription PCR was performed in 300 samples (260 SARS-CoV-2 positives and 40 negatives), using both the conventional nucleic acid extraction method (standard method) and the direct method without nucleic acid extraction (direct method). The overall agreement between the standard and direct methods was 86.8 % (kappa 0.60), and the sensitivity of the direct method compared to the standard method was 85.4 %. When the cycle threshold (Ct) value was less than 35, the sensitivity was approximately 90 %-98 %, and when Ct exceeded 35, it decreased to approximately 60 %-65 %. The extraction-free PCR could be useful as a screening test that processes many samples in a short time.

摘要

由于2019年冠状病毒病大流行,对易于获得的高通量筛查检测的需求正在增加。我们旨在评估免提取聚合酶链反应(PCR)作为检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的筛查检测的实用性。使用传统核酸提取方法(标准方法)和无核酸提取的直接方法,对300份样本(260份SARS-CoV-2阳性和40份阴性)进行实时逆转录PCR。标准方法和直接方法之间的总体一致性为86.8%(kappa值为0.60),直接方法相对于标准方法的灵敏度为85.4%。当循环阈值(Ct)值小于35时,灵敏度约为90%-98%,当Ct超过35时,灵敏度降至约60%-65%。免提取PCR作为一种能在短时间内处理大量样本的筛查检测可能是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41e3/8223006/cae4f3555c71/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验