Nurs Res. 2021;70(5S Suppl 1):S13-S20. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000533.
Patterns of food security persistently vary by race, yet limited research has examined how community-specific experiences of race and racism are associated with nutritional outcomes.
This analysis describes a novel approach for classifying experiences of race and racism and explores the relationship between identified classes and measures of food security and diet quality.
Cross-sectional self-reported survey data from 306 African American adults living in two urban midwestern cities were collected in 2017-2018. Measures of racialized experiences assessed consciousness of race, perceived discrimination, and health effects of perceived discrimination. Food security was measured with a six-item screener and diet quality with the Healthy Eating Index-2010. Latent class analysis was used to generate racialized classes. Bivariate analyses were conducted to examine differences in class membership by sociodemographics and nutrition outcomes.
Participants were majority women who were receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. Three racialized classes were identified: Class 1 reported few racialized experiences (42.8% of the sample), Class 2 was racially conscious with few experiences of discrimination (45.1%), and Class 3 was both racially conscious and affected by racialized actions (12.1%). Racialized classes were significantly different in mean household income, level of education, home ownership, and job loss in the past year. Class 3 was the least represented among those that were food secure and the most represented among those that were very low food secure. There were no differences by class in Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores.
Findings offer an innovative method for measuring exposures to racism and for assessing its relationship to food security. Findings highlight heterogeneity of racialized experiences in similar contexts as well as potential root cause targets such as wages, education, home ownership, and employment that may be modulated to mitigate the effects of racism on food insecurity.
种族之间的食品安全模式持续存在差异,但很少有研究探讨社区特有的种族和种族主义经历与营养结果之间的关系。
本分析描述了一种分类种族和种族主义经历的新方法,并探讨了确定的种族和种族主义经历类别与食品安全和饮食质量测量指标之间的关系。
2017-2018 年,在两个中西部城市,对 306 名非裔美国成年人进行了横断面自我报告调查,收集了他们的调查数据。评估种族化经历的指标包括种族意识、感知歧视和感知歧视对健康的影响。使用六项筛选器测量食品安全,使用 2010 年健康饮食指数(Healthy Eating Index-2010)测量饮食质量。使用潜在类别分析生成种族化类别。进行单变量分析,以检查社会人口统计学和营养结果的类别成员差异。
参与者中大多数为女性,并且正在享受补充营养援助计划(Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program)的福利。确定了三个种族化类别:第 1 类报告的种族化经历很少(样本的 42.8%),第 2 类具有种族意识,经历的歧视很少(45.1%),第 3 类既有种族意识,又受到种族化行为的影响(12.1%)。在家庭收入、教育程度、住房拥有率和过去一年失业方面,种族化类别之间存在显著差异。第 3 类在那些食品安全的人中代表性最低,而在那些非常低的食品安全的人中代表性最高。在健康饮食指数(Healthy Eating Index-2010)评分方面,各类别之间没有差异。
研究结果提供了一种衡量种族主义暴露的创新方法,并评估了其与食品安全之间的关系。研究结果突出了在类似背景下种族化经历的异质性,以及工资、教育、住房拥有率和就业等潜在的根本原因目标,这些目标可能会被调节,以减轻种族主义对食品不安全的影响。