Department of Statistics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Information Science and Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
J Biopharm Stat. 2021 Sep 3;31(5):583-602. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2021.1934856. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
This paper proposes two new approximate confidence limit methods for the common odds ratio from multiple 2 × 2 tables. The two new procedures, based on the asymptotic distribution of Woolf estimator and Mantel-Haenszel estimator, associate with inverse sinh transformation. We employ three pseudo-frequency methods to calculate confidence intervals in order to avoid the interval failure caused by the presence of zero cells in multiple 2 × 2 tables. We develop the modified inverse sinh intervals for the common odds ratio which add one pseudo-frequency () to all the cells before computing the point estimate of common odds ratio and another pseudo-frequency () to all the cells before computing the standard error estimate. The simulation is to evaluate the 22 confidence intervals, including Woolf, Mantel-Haenszel, their inverse sinh intervals, and their pseudo-frequency modified inverse sinh intervals, in terms of their coverage probabilities and average log lengths. Simulation results demonstrate that the adjusted inverse sinh intervals by two different pseudo-frequencies perform quite well when is slightly greater than since the coverage probabilities of them are closer to confidence level of 95%. Larger values of lead to narrow intervals and low coverage probabilities. We also find that inverse sinh intervals are shorter than untransformed intervals based on Woolf estimator and Mantel-Haenszel estimator, respectively. These procedures were illustrated with two clinical trials.
本文提出了两种新的适用于多个 2×2 列联表的共同优势比的近似置信限方法。这两种新方法基于 Woolf 估计量和 Mantel-Haenszel 估计量的渐近分布,并与逆双曲正弦变换相关联。我们采用三种伪频率方法来计算置信区间,以避免由于多个 2×2 列联表中存在零单元格而导致的区间失效。我们为共同优势比开发了修正的逆双曲正弦区间,在计算共同优势比的点估计之前,对所有单元格添加一个伪频率 (),并在计算标准误差估计之前,对所有单元格添加另一个伪频率 ()。模拟是为了评估 22 个置信区间,包括 Woolf、Mantel-Haenszel、它们的逆双曲正弦区间以及它们的伪频率修正逆双曲正弦区间,以评估它们的覆盖概率和平均对数长度。模拟结果表明,当 略大于 时,通过两种不同伪频率进行调整的逆双曲正弦区间表现良好,因为它们的覆盖概率更接近 95%的置信水平。较大的 值会导致区间变窄和覆盖概率降低。我们还发现,逆双曲正弦区间比基于 Woolf 估计量和 Mantel-Haenszel 估计量的未转换区间短。这两个临床试验说明了这些程序。