Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Department of Ophthalmology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 1;139(8):887-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.2045.
Big data studies may allow for the aggregation of patients with rare diseases such as uveitis to answer important clinical questions. Standardization of uveitis-related variables will be necessary, including the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes used to identify patients of interest. There are currently limited data on the uniformity of diagnosis mapping to ICD-10 codes for uveitis diagnoses among different health systems.
To assess the degree of uniformity in mapping of uveitis clinical concepts to ICD-10 codes across health care systems using the same electronic health record (EHR) system.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter survey study was conducted between September 14 and October 9, 2020, at 5 academic health care systems that use the Epic EHR. Researchers from the University of Washington, Harvard University, Stanford University, Yale University, and the University of California, San Francisco queried 54 uveitis-related diagnostic terms and recorded the associated ICD-10 codes.
The degree of uniformity for uveitis clinical concepts and associated ICD-10 codes.
Fifty-four uveitis-related diagnostic terms were queried within the Epic EHR at 5 different health care systems. There was perfect agreement among all 5 centers for 52 of the 54 diagnostic terms. Two diagnostic terms had differences in ICD-10 coding: juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated chronic uveitis and intermediate uveitis. Intermediate uveitis was associated with codes H20.1x (ICD-10 description: chronic iridocyclitis) or H20.9 (ICD-10 description: unspecified iridocyclitis) in 3 centers while being associated with code H30.2x (ICD-10 description: posterior cyclitis) at the 2 remaining centers. The discrepancies appear to be related to a recent update in diagnostic mapping in the Epic EHR.
This study suggests that ICD-10 code mapping to uveitis diagnostic terminology appears to be highly uniform at different centers with the Epic EHR. However, temporal changes in diagnosis mapping to ICD-10 codes and a lack of 1-to-1 mapping of diagnosis to ICD-10 code add additional sources of complexity to the interpretation of big data studies in uveitis.
大数据研究可以允许对诸如葡萄膜炎等罕见疾病的患者进行汇总,以回答重要的临床问题。将葡萄膜炎相关变量标准化是必要的,包括用于识别感兴趣患者的国际疾病分类和相关健康问题第十次修订版(ICD-10)代码。目前,关于不同医疗体系中葡萄膜炎诊断与 ICD-10 代码映射的诊断一致性的数据有限。
使用相同的电子健康记录(EHR)系统,评估不同医疗体系中葡萄膜炎临床概念与 ICD-10 代码映射的一致性程度。
设计、地点和参与者:这项多中心调查研究于 2020 年 9 月 14 日至 10 月 9 日在 5 个使用 Epic EHR 的学术医疗中心进行。来自华盛顿大学、哈佛大学、斯坦福大学、耶鲁大学和加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校的研究人员查询了 54 个与葡萄膜炎相关的诊断术语,并记录了相关的 ICD-10 代码。
葡萄膜炎临床概念和相关 ICD-10 代码的一致性程度。
在 5 个不同的医疗系统中,在 Epic EHR 中查询了 54 个与葡萄膜炎相关的诊断术语。对于 54 个诊断术语中的 52 个,所有 5 个中心都完全一致。有两个诊断术语的 ICD-10 编码存在差异:幼年特发性关节炎相关慢性葡萄膜炎和中间葡萄膜炎。在 3 个中心,中间葡萄膜炎与 H20.1x(ICD-10 描述:慢性虹膜炎)或 H20.9(ICD-10 描述:未特指的虹膜炎)相关,而在其余 2 个中心则与 H30.2x(ICD-10 描述:后葡萄膜炎)相关。这种差异似乎与 Epic EHR 中最近对诊断映射的更新有关。
这项研究表明,在使用 Epic EHR 的不同中心,ICD-10 代码与葡萄膜炎诊断术语的映射似乎高度一致。然而,诊断映射到 ICD-10 代码的时间变化以及诊断与 ICD-10 代码之间缺乏一一对应关系,为葡萄膜炎大数据研究的解释增加了额外的复杂性。