Bartos Csilla, Szabó-Révész Piroska, Horváth Tamás, Varga Patrícia, Ambrus Rita
Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology and Regulatory Affairs, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jun 8;13(6):846. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060846.
Nowadays, the intranasal route has become a reliable alternative route for drug administration to the systemic circulation or central nervous system. However, there are no official in vitro diffusion and dissolution tests especially for the investigation of nasal formulations. Our main goal was to study and compare a well-known and a lesser-known in vitro permeability investigation method, in order to ascertain which was suitable for the determination of drug permeability through the nasal mucosa from different formulations. The vertical diffusion cell (Franz cell) was compared with the horizontal diffusion model (Side-Bi-Side). Raw and nanonized meloxicam containing nasal dosage forms (spray, gel and powder) were tested and compared. It was found that the Side-Bi-Side cell was suitable for the investigation of spray and powder forms. In contrast, the gel was not measurable on the Side-Bi-Side cell; due to its high viscosity, a uniform distribution of the active substance could not be ensured in the donor phase. The Franz cell, designed for the analysis of semi-solid formulations, was desirable for the investigation of nasal gels. It can be concluded that the application of a horizontal cell is recommended for liquid and solid nasal preparations, while the vertical one should be used for semi-solid formulations.
如今,鼻内给药途径已成为药物进入体循环或中枢神经系统的一种可靠替代途径。然而,目前尚无专门用于鼻腔制剂研究的官方体外扩散和溶出试验。我们的主要目标是研究和比较一种广为人知和一种鲜为人知的体外渗透性研究方法,以确定哪种方法适用于测定不同制剂中药物透过鼻黏膜的渗透性。将垂直扩散池(弗兰兹扩散池)与水平扩散模型(并排扩散池)进行了比较。对含有原料药和纳米化美洛昔康的鼻腔剂型(喷雾剂、凝胶剂和粉剂)进行了测试和比较。结果发现,并排扩散池适用于喷雾剂和粉剂的研究。相比之下,凝胶剂在并排扩散池上无法测量;由于其高粘度,无法确保供体相中活性物质的均匀分布。专为半固体制剂分析设计的弗兰兹扩散池适用于鼻腔凝胶剂的研究。可以得出结论,对于液体和固体鼻腔制剂,建议使用水平扩散池,而对于半固体制剂,则应使用垂直扩散池。