Corrao Giulia, Zaffaroni Mattia, Bergamaschi Luca, Augugliaro Matteo, Volpe Stefania, Pepa Matteo, Bonizzi Giuseppina, Pece Salvatore, Amodio Nicola, Mistretta Francesco Alessandro, Luzzago Stefano, Musi Gennaro, Alessi Sarah, La Fauci Francesco Maria, Tordonato Chiara, Tosoni Daniela, Cattani Federica, Gandini Sara, Petralia Giuseppe, Pravettoni Gabriella, De Cobelli Ottavio, Viale Giuseppe, Orecchia Roberto, Marvaso Giulia, Jereczek-Fossa Barbara Alicja
Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 30;13(13):3278. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133278.
In recent years, a growing interest has been directed towards oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC), as patients with three to five metastatic lesions have shown a significantly better survival as compared with those harboring a higher number of lesions. The efficacy of local ablative treatments directed on metastatic lesions (metastases-directed treatments) was extensively investigated, with the aim of preventing further disease progression and delaying the start of systemic androgen deprivation therapies. Definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer is traditionally based on histopathological analysis. Nevertheless, a bioptic sample-static in nature-inevitably fails to reflect the dynamics of the tumor and its biological response due to the dynamic selective pressure of cancer therapies, which can profoundly influence spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Furthermore, even with new imaging technologies allowing an increasingly early detection, the diagnosis of oligometastasis is currently based exclusively on radiological investigations. Given these premises, the development of minimally-invasive liquid biopsies was recently promoted and implemented as predictive biomarkers both for clinical decision-making at pre-treatment (baseline assessment) and for monitoring treatment response during the clinical course of the disease. Through liquid biopsy, different biomarkers, commonly extracted from blood, urine or saliva, can be characterized and implemented in clinical routine to select targeted therapies and assess treatment response. Moreover, this approach has the potential to act as a tissue substitute and to accelerate the identification of novel and consistent predictive analytes cost-efficiently. However, the utility of tumor profiling is currently limited in OMPC due to the lack of clinically validated predictive biomarkers. In this scenario, different ongoing trials, such as the RADIOSA trial, might provide additional insights into the biology of the oligometastatic state and on the identification of novel biomarkers for the outlining of true oligometastatic patients, paving the way towards a wider ideal approach of personalized medicine. The aim of the present narrative review is to report the current state of the art on the solidity of liquid biopsy-related analytes such as CTCs, cfDNA, miRNA and epi-miRNA, and to provide a benchmark for their further clinical implementation. Arguably, this kind of molecular profiling could refine current developments in the era of precision oncology and lead to more refined therapeutic strategies in this subset of oligometastatic patients.
近年来,人们对寡转移前列腺癌(OMPC)的兴趣日益浓厚,因为与有更多转移灶的患者相比,有三到五个转移灶的患者生存率显著更高。针对转移灶的局部消融治疗(转移灶导向治疗)的疗效得到了广泛研究,目的是防止疾病进一步进展并推迟全身雄激素剥夺疗法的开始。前列腺癌的明确诊断传统上基于组织病理学分析。然而,由于癌症治疗的动态选择压力会深刻影响时空异质性,本质上静态的活检样本不可避免地无法反映肿瘤的动态变化及其生物学反应。此外,即使有了能实现越来越早期检测的新成像技术,寡转移的诊断目前仍完全基于影像学检查。基于这些前提,最近推动并实施了微创液体活检,将其作为治疗前(基线评估)临床决策以及疾病临床过程中监测治疗反应的预测生物标志物。通过液体活检,可以对通常从血液、尿液或唾液中提取的不同生物标志物进行表征,并应用于临床常规,以选择靶向治疗并评估治疗反应。此外,这种方法有可能替代组织,并以具有成本效益的方式加速新型一致预测分析物的鉴定。然而,由于缺乏经过临床验证的预测生物标志物,肿瘤分析在OMPC中的应用目前受到限制。在这种情况下,不同的正在进行的试验,如RADIOSA试验,可能会为寡转移状态的生物学以及识别真正寡转移患者的新型生物标志物提供更多见解,为更广泛的个性化医学理想方法铺平道路。本叙述性综述的目的是报告液体活检相关分析物(如循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)、游离DNA(cfDNA)、微小RNA(miRNA)和表观微小RNA(epi - miRNA))可靠性的当前技术水平,并为它们的进一步临床应用提供基准。可以说,这种分子分析可以完善精准肿瘤学时代的当前发展,并为这一寡转移患者亚群带来更精细的治疗策略。