School of Nursing and Midwifery, Logan Campus, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia; Maternity Services, Grafton Base Hospital, Northern Health District, NWSW Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Logan Campus, Griffith University, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland 4131, Australia.
Midwifery. 2021 Nov;102:103074. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103074. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
Technologies for fetal heart rate monitoring have been widely introduced despite evidence of no improvement in perinatal outcomes. A significant body of research has raised concerns that healthcare information technologies can have unintended consequences. We sought to describe an unintended consequence of central fetal monitoring technology.
The research was conducted as an Institutional Ethnography. Data generated from interviews, focus groups, and observations were analysed to generate an account of midwives' experiences with the central fetal monitoring system.
The birthing unit of one Australian maternity service with a central fetal monitoring system.
34 midwives and midwifery students who worked with the central fetal monitoring system.
Midwives described a disruptive social event they named being K2ed. Clinicians responded to perceived cardiotocograph abnormalities by entering the birth room despite the midwife not having requested assistance. Being K2ed disrupted midwives' clinical work and generated anxiety. Clinical communication was undermined, and midwives altered their clinical practice. Midwives performed additional documentation work to attempt to avoid being K2ed.
This is the first report of an unintended consequence relating to central fetal monitoring, demonstrating how central fetal monitoring technology potentially undermines safety by impacting on clinical and relational processes and outcomes in maternity care.
Current evidence does not support implementation or ongoing use of central fetal monitoring systems. Further research is needed to inform scaling down central fetal monitoring systems in a safe and supported way.
尽管胎儿心率监测技术并未改善围产期结局,但仍已广泛应用。大量研究表明,医疗保健信息技术可能会产生意想不到的后果。我们旨在描述中央胎儿监测技术的一个意外后果。
本研究采用机构民族志方法进行。通过访谈、焦点小组和观察收集的数据进行分析,以生成助产士对中央胎儿监测系统体验的描述。
一家澳大利亚产科服务机构的分娩单元,配备中央胎儿监测系统。
与中央胎儿监测系统合作的 34 名助产士和助产士学生。
助产士描述了一种被称为“被 K2 了”的干扰性社会事件。尽管助产士没有请求帮助,但临床医生还是会对感知到的胎心监护图异常做出反应,进入分娩室。“被 K2 了”会干扰助产士的临床工作并引发焦虑。临床沟通受到破坏,助产士改变了他们的临床实践。助产士会进行额外的文件记录工作,以试图避免被“K2”。
这是首次报告与中央胎儿监测相关的意外后果,表明中央胎儿监测技术如何通过影响产妇护理中的临床和关系过程和结果,潜在地破坏安全性。
目前的证据并不支持实施或继续使用中央胎儿监测系统。需要进一步研究,以安全和支持的方式缩小中央胎儿监测系统的规模。