Uthoff Aaron, Sommerfield Lesley M, Pichardo Andrew W
Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand ; and.
Robert E. Lee High School, Tyler, Texas.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Sep 1;35(9):2651-2660. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004085.
Uthoff, A, Sommerfield, LM, and Pichardo, AW. Effects of resistance training methods on golf clubhead speed and hitting distance: A systematic review. J Strength Cond Res 35(9): 2651-2660, 2021-Resistance training is widely regarded within the golfing community to improve golf performance by increasing clubhead speed (CHS) and drive distance and can be classified into 3 categories: nonspecific, specific, and combined. However, it is currently unclear which resistance training methods are most effective in improving predictors of golf performance. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to compare the effectiveness of nonspecific, specific, and combined strength training methods on CHS and drive distance. A systematic search strategy was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify eligible articles through PubMed, SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE (EBSCO), and Google Scholar. The searches identified 4,557 potentially relevant results, with 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Thirteen studies investigated nonspecific resistance training, one study investigated specific resistance training, and 7 studies investigated combined resistance training. Collectively, resistance training positively impacts golf CHS and hitting distance, but adaptations vary depending on the type and intensity of training, as well as subject's characteristics. Using a combination of nonspecific and golf-specific training (average increase of 4.1% CHS and 5.2% hitting distance) seems to enhance golf performance more than nonspecific strength training (average increase of 1.6% CHS and 4.8% hitting distance). Eight-week programs including golf-specific movements at high velocities for 3 to 4 sets of 5 to 15 repetitions are the most effective in increasing CHS and hitting distance. Future research investigating how golf-specific training influences CHS and hitting distance in various subgroups may provide further insight regarding prescription of this training type.
乌托夫、A、索默菲尔德、LM和皮查多、AW。阻力训练方法对高尔夫球杆头速度和击球距离的影响:一项系统综述。《力量与体能研究杂志》35(9): 2651 - 2660,2021年——阻力训练在高尔夫球界被广泛认为可通过提高杆头速度(CHS)和击球距离来提升高尔夫球表现,且可分为三类:非特异性、特异性和综合性。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种阻力训练方法在改善高尔夫球表现预测指标方面最为有效。因此,本综述的目的是比较非特异性、特异性和综合性力量训练方法对CHS和击球距离的有效性。使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行了系统检索策略,以通过PubMed、SPORTDiscus、MEDLINE(EBSCO)和谷歌学术搜索来识别符合条件的文章。检索共识别出4557个潜在相关结果,其中20项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入最终综述。13项研究调查了非特异性阻力训练,1项研究调查了特异性阻力训练,7项研究调查了综合性阻力训练。总体而言,阻力训练对高尔夫球CHS和击球距离有积极影响,但适应性变化取决于训练类型和强度以及受试者特征。使用非特异性和高尔夫专项训练相结合的方法(CHS平均提高4.1%,击球距离平均提高5.2%)似乎比非特异性力量训练(CHS平均提高1.6%,击球距离平均提高4.8%)更能提升高尔夫球表现。包括以高速进行3至4组、每组5至15次重复的高尔夫专项动作的八周训练计划在增加CHS和击球距离方面最为有效。未来研究调查高尔夫专项训练如何影响不同亚组的CHS和击球距离,可能会为这种训练类型的处方提供进一步的见解。