Awad Jehad A, Dhair Majdi I, Ghuneim Nedal I, Abu Ali Khaled, Al-Yaqoubi Yousef S, Abu Rabee' Maysoon, Sarsour Amal
Ministry of Health, Gaza, occupied Palestinian territory.
University College of Science and Technology, Gaza, occupied Palestinian territory.
Lancet. 2021 Jul;398 Suppl 1:S27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01513-0.
In the occupied Palestinian territory, the expanded programme on immunisation (EPI) has successfully targeted 13 diseases through vaccination and achieved high population coverage. However, surveillance of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is inadequate in the Gaza Strip, as only post-BCG lymphadenitis is reported. This study assessed the adherence of health-care workers (HCWs) to the AEFI surveillance system in the Gaza Strip.
Data were collected by four methods: 105 HCWs answered a questionnaire; 24 health facilities completed a checklist enquiry; 17 medical health officers and information system managers from Ministry of Health (MOH) and UNRWA health centres and hospitals underwent in-depth interviews; and a focus group was held with 22 epidemiologists, stakeholders, consultants, and managers of the EPI. The 24 health facilities comprised seven MOH primary health-care centres (PHCs) providing vaccination, five MOH PHCs not providing vaccination, seven UNRWA PHCs, and the five hospitals of the Gaza Strip with paediatric departments. Data collected from June, 2015, to August, 2015, were analysed with SPSS version 19. Relationships among variables were assessed by independent t tests, chi squared tests and one-way ANOVA. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants, and written approval for the study was obtained from MOH and UNWRA directorates.
AEFI are reported infrequently; approximately half of the 105 HCWs (51%; 53) report AEFI, but there were conflicting views as to whom they should report. 65% (68) thought that they should report all AEFI. Participants' educational background, participation in workshops, and number of years of employment affected AEFI recognition and reporting. The majority (74%; 78) participate in immunisation workshops. There is an ineffective structure in MOH centres, and the UNRWA has a well-established internal system for reporting AEFI but a poor system for external reporting to the MOH epidemiology department. A lack of HCW awareness of responsibilities may also have a role. The majority of HCWs (95%; 100) reported a need for further training, and all reported a lack of cooperation or coordination between hospitals and PHCs regarding AEFI notification. All individuals (17) who were interviewed knew that they must report AEFI. A majority (65%; 11) stated no difficulties, whereas some (35%; six) reported difficulties due to absence of guidelines, protocols, or notification forms, and to fear of punishment. Focus group participants felt that all AEFI should be reported. They agreed that HCWs face obstacles such as fear of consequences, lack of knowledge and training, high workloads, not considering AEFI as related to immunisation, and absence or shortage of notification forms, protocols, and guidelines. Some felt that certain AEFI should be reported only to treating doctors, but all agreed that there is no cooperation or coordination among PHCs and between hospitals and PHCs regarding AEFI reporting.
Common themes may explain poor adherence of HCWs to AEFI surveillance. The system is ineffective in MOH centres, and UNRWA PHCs have well-established internal but poor external reporting systems. Absence of monitoring may have a role, and a lack of guidelines, protocols, and forms for reporting were mentioned by HCWs, medical health officers and information system managers, and the focus group. Some HCWs may not know their responsibilities (eg, to whom AEFI should be reported). Many other obstacles face HCWs, including fear of punishment and accountability. Therefore, HCWs must be encouraged to report adverse events without fear of penalty. In addition, lack of education on AEFI and lack of experience in identifying AEFI may affect reporting. Training of HCWs, development of guidelines and protocols, database construction and design, and monitoring of the AEFI surveillance system are highly recommended.
WHO EMRO.
在巴勒斯坦被占领土,扩大免疫规划(EPI)已通过疫苗接种成功针对13种疾病,并实现了高人口覆盖率。然而,加沙地带免疫接种后不良事件(AEFI)的监测不足,因为仅报告了卡介苗接种后淋巴结炎。本研究评估了加沙地带医护人员对AEFI监测系统的依从性。
通过四种方法收集数据:105名医护人员回答了问卷;24个卫生机构完成了清单查询;来自卫生部(MOH)、近东救济工程处卫生中心和医院的17名医疗卫生官员和信息系统管理人员接受了深入访谈;并与22名流行病学家、利益相关者、顾问和EPI管理人员举行了焦点小组讨论。24个卫生机构包括7个提供疫苗接种的MOH初级卫生保健中心(PHC)、5个不提供疫苗接种的MOH PHC、7个近东救济工程处PHC以及加沙地带设有儿科部门的5家医院。对2015年6月至2015年8月收集的数据使用SPSS 19版进行分析。通过独立t检验、卡方检验和单因素方差分析评估变量之间的关系。获得了所有参与者的口头知情同意,并获得了MOH和近东救济工程处主任办公室对该研究的书面批准。
AEFI报告不频繁;105名医护人员中约一半(51%;53人)报告了AEFI,但对于应向谁报告存在相互矛盾的观点。65%(68人)认为他们应报告所有AEFI。参与者的教育背景、参加研讨会情况和工作年限影响AEFI的识别和报告。大多数(74%;78人)参加了免疫接种研讨会。MOH中心的结构无效,近东救济工程处有完善的内部AEFI报告系统,但向MOH流行病学部门的外部报告系统不佳。医护人员对责任缺乏认识可能也起到了一定作用。大多数医护人员(95%;100人)报告需要进一步培训,并且所有人都报告在AEFI通报方面医院和PHC之间缺乏合作或协调。所有接受访谈的个人(17人)都知道他们必须报告AEFI。大多数(65%;11人)表示没有困难,而一些人(35%;6人)报告由于缺乏指南、规程或通报表以及害怕受到惩罚而存在困难。焦点小组参与者认为所有AEFI都应报告。他们一致认为医护人员面临诸如害怕后果、缺乏知识和培训、工作量大、不认为AEFI与免疫接种有关以及缺乏或缺少通报表、规程和指南等障碍。一些人认为某些AEFI仅应报告给主治医生,但所有人都同意在AEFI报告方面PHC之间以及医院和PHC之间没有合作或协调。
共同主题可能解释了医护人员对AEFI监测依从性差的原因。该系统在MOH中心无效,近东救济工程处PHC有完善的内部报告系统但外部报告系统不佳。缺乏监测可能起到了一定作用,医护人员、医疗卫生官员和信息系统管理人员以及焦点小组都提到了缺乏报告指南、规程和表格。一些医护人员可能不知道他们的责任(例如,AEFI应向谁报告)。医护人员还面临许多其他障碍,包括害怕受到惩罚和问责。因此,必须鼓励医护人员报告不良事件而不必担心受到惩罚。此外,对AEFI缺乏教育以及识别AEFI的经验不足可能会影响报告。强烈建议对医护人员进行培训、制定指南和规程、建设和设计数据库以及监测AEFI监测系统。
世界卫生组织东地中海区域办事处。