Suppr超能文献

种植体周围炎的治疗是否有效?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Is Implantoplasty Efficacious at Treating Peri-Implantitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;79(11):2270-2279. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease, characterized by the progressive loss of the peri-implant support bone tissue. The objective of this study was to assess whether implantoplasty is efficacious in promoting peri-implant health.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a search without restrictions regarding language or date of publication was conducted across different databases. Grey literature search, Google Scholar search and manual searches were also carried out. Studies evaluating periimplant clinical parameters of individuals with peri-implantitis who had been submitted to implantoplasty were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted. The outcome variables were implant probing depth, the percentage of implants with bleeding on probing or suppuration on probing, and the success rate of implants after implantoplasty. The predictor variable was implantoplasty and the follow-up time after implantoplasty. Data on sample size, implant location, implant diameter, and diagnostic criteria for peri-implantitis were also collected during data extraction. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and analysis of the probability of implant success after implantoplasty with the Kalan-Meier method were performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-four studies were assessed. Eight articles were included and 7 were incorporated into quantitative analyses. Subjects' mean age ranged between 50 to 70.7 years. The studies demonstrated that implantoplasty contributed to a significant improvement in the peri-implant condition, reducing the probing depth, bleeding and suppuration on probing. Overall, the included studies exhibited low risk of bias. Meta-analysis demonstrated that probing depth before implantoplasty was significantly higher than after implantoplasty (mean difference = -3.37 mm, confidence interval = -4.74; -2.00). This result was confirmed in the sensitivity analysis. The probability of success of implants at 6 months of follow-up after implantoplasty was 97.5% and at 24 months of follow-up was 94.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence in the literature to recommend implantoplasty as a potential treatment for periimplantitis.

摘要

目的

种植体周围炎是一种炎症性疾病,其特征是种植体周围支持骨组织的进行性丧失。本研究的目的是评估种植体成形术是否能有效地促进种植体周围健康。

方法

在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们对不同数据库进行了无语言或出版日期限制的检索。我们还进行了灰色文献搜索、Google Scholar 搜索和手动搜索。纳入了评估接受种植体成形术的种植体周围炎患者的种植体临床参数的研究。我们进行了研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。结果变量是种植体探诊深度、探诊出血或探诊溢脓的种植体百分比以及种植体成形术后种植体的成功率。预测变量是种植体成形术和种植体成形术后的随访时间。在数据提取过程中,我们还收集了样本量、种植体位置、种植体直径和种植体周围炎的诊断标准的数据。我们进行了荟萃分析、敏感性分析和使用 Kalan-Meier 方法分析种植体成形术后种植体成功的概率。

结果

评估了 94 项研究。纳入了 8 篇文章,其中 7 篇纳入了定量分析。受试者的平均年龄在 50 岁至 70.7 岁之间。研究表明,种植体成形术有助于改善种植体周围状况,减少探诊深度、探诊出血和探诊溢脓。总体而言,纳入的研究显示出低偏倚风险。荟萃分析表明,种植体成形术前的探诊深度明显高于种植体成形术后(平均差异=-3.37mm,置信区间=-4.74;-2.00)。这一结果在敏感性分析中得到了证实。种植体成形术后 6 个月和 24 个月的随访时,种植体的成功率分别为 97.5%和 94.7%。

结论

文献中有一些证据表明种植体成形术是治疗种植体周围炎的一种潜在方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验