Chronobiology Lab, Department of Physiology, College of Biology, University of Murcia, Mare Nostrum Campus, IUIE, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Ciber Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0254171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254171. eCollection 2021.
An appropriate exposure to the light-dark cycle, with high irradiances during the day and darkness during the night is essential to keep our physiology on time. However, considering the increasing exposure to artificial light at night and its potential harmful effects on health (i.e. chronodisruption and associated health conditions), it is essential to understand the non-visual effects of light in humans. Melatonin suppression is considered the gold standard for nocturnal light effects, and the activation of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) through the assessment of pupillary light reflex (PLR) has been recently gaining attention. Also, some theoretical models for melatonin suppression and retinal photoreceptors activation have been proposed. Our aim in this study was to determine the influence of correlated color temperature (CCT) on melatonin suppression and PLR, considering two commercial light sources, as well as to explore the possible correlation between both processes. Also, the contribution of irradiance (associated to CCT) was explored through mathematical modelling on a wider range of light sources. For that, melatonin suppression and PLR were experimentally assessed on 16 healthy and young volunteers under two light conditions (warmer, CCT 3000 K; and cooler, CCT 5700 K, at ~5·1018 photons/cm2/sec). Our experimental results yielded greater post-stimulus constriction under the cooler (5700 K, 13.3 ± 1.9%) than under the warmer light (3000 K, 8.7 ± 1.2%) (p < 0.01), although no significant differences were found between both conditions in terms of melatonin suppression. Interestingly, we failed to demonstrate correlation between PLR and melatonin suppression. Although methodological limitations cannot be discarded, this could be due to the existence of different subpopulations of Type 1 ipRGCs differentially contributing to PLR and melatonin suppression, which opens the way for further research on ipRGCs projection in humans. The application of theoretical modelling suggested that CCT should not be considered separately from irradiance when designing nocturnal/diurnal illumination systems. Further experimental studies on wider ranges of CCTs and light intensities are needed to confirm these conclusions.
适当的明暗周期暴露,白天高照度和夜间黑暗度是维持我们生理节律的关键。然而,考虑到夜间人工光照的增加及其对健康的潜在有害影响(即生物钟打乱和相关健康状况),了解光对人类的非视觉影响至关重要。褪黑素抑制被认为是夜间光照影响的金标准,通过评估瞳孔光反射(PLR)来激活内在光敏视网膜神经节细胞(ipRGCs)最近受到关注。此外,一些褪黑素抑制和视网膜光感受器激活的理论模型已经提出。我们在这项研究中的目的是确定相关色温(CCT)对褪黑素抑制和 PLR 的影响,考虑两种商业光源,并探索这两个过程之间的可能相关性。此外,还通过数学建模在更广泛的光源范围内探索了辐照度(与 CCT 相关)的贡献。为此,我们在 16 名健康年轻志愿者身上进行了两项实验,在两种光照条件下(较暖,CCT 3000 K;较冷,CCT 5700 K,约为 5·1018 光子/cm2/sec)评估褪黑素抑制和 PLR。我们的实验结果显示,在较冷(5700 K,13.3 ± 1.9%)光线下,刺激后的瞳孔收缩比在较暖(3000 K,8.7 ± 1.2%)光线下更大(p < 0.01),尽管在褪黑素抑制方面,两种条件之间没有发现显著差异。有趣的是,我们未能证明 PLR 和褪黑素抑制之间存在相关性。尽管不能排除方法学上的限制,但这可能是由于不同类型 1 ipRGCs 的亚群对 PLR 和褪黑素抑制的贡献不同,这为进一步研究人类 ipRGCs 的投射开辟了道路。理论模型的应用表明,在设计昼夜照明系统时,不应将 CCT 与辐照度分开考虑。需要进一步进行更广泛 CCT 和光照强度的实验研究,以确认这些结论。