Suppr超能文献

一项增强社区护士领导力计划的过程评估

Process evaluation of a programme to empower community nurse leadership.

作者信息

Vogel Ruth G M, Bours Gerrie J J W, Rooijackers Teuni H, Metzelthin Silke F, Erkens Petra M G, van Rossum Erik, Zwakhalen Sandra M G

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 12;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00650-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Nurses in the Lead (NitL) programme consists of a systematic approach and training to 1) empower community nurses in implementing evidence, targeted at encouraging functional activities of older adults, and 2) train community nurses in enabling team members to change their practice. This article aims to describe the process evaluation of NitL.

METHODS

A mixed-methods formative process evaluation with a predominantly qualitative approach was conducted. Qualitative data were collected by interviews with community nurses (n = 7), focus groups with team members (n = 31), and reviewing seven implementation plans and 28 patient records. Quantitative data were collected among community nurses and team members (N = 90) using a questionnaire to assess barriers in encouraging functional activities and attendance lists. Data analysis was carried out through descriptive statistics and content analysis.

RESULTS

NitL was largely executed according to plan. Points of attention were the use and value of the background theory within the training, completion of implementation plans, and reporting in patient records by community nurses. Inhibiting factors for showing leadership and encouraging functional activities were a lack of time and a high complexity of care; facilitating factors were structure and clear communication within teams. Nurses considered the systematic approach useful and the training educational for their role. Most team members considered NitL practical and were satisfied with the coaching provided by community nurses. To optimise NitL, community nurses recommended providing the training first and extending the training. The team members recommended continuing clinical lessons, which were an implementation strategy from the community nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

NitL was largely executed as planned, and appears worthy of further application in community care practice. However, adaptations are recommended to make NitL more promising in practice in empowering community nurse leadership in implementing evidence.

摘要

背景

“护士引领”(NitL)项目包含一种系统方法和培训,旨在:1)增强社区护士实施循证实践的能力,以鼓励老年人进行功能活动;2)培训社区护士,使其能够促使团队成员改变其执业行为。本文旨在描述NitL的过程评估。

方法

开展了一项以定性方法为主的混合方法形成性过程评估。通过对社区护士进行访谈(n = 7)、与团队成员进行焦点小组讨论(n = 31)以及审查七份实施计划和28份患者记录来收集定性数据。使用问卷收集社区护士和团队成员(N = 90)的定量数据,以评估在鼓励功能活动方面的障碍和出勤名单。通过描述性统计和内容分析进行数据分析。

结果

NitL基本按计划执行。需要关注的要点包括培训中背景理论的使用和价值、实施计划的完成情况以及社区护士在患者记录中的报告。展现领导力和鼓励功能活动的抑制因素是时间不足和护理工作高度复杂;促进因素是团队内部的结构和清晰沟通。护士们认为该系统方法有用,且培训对其角色具有教育意义。大多数团队成员认为NitL实用,并对社区护士提供的指导感到满意。为优化NitL,社区护士建议先提供培训并延长培训时间。团队成员建议继续开展临床课程,这是社区护士的一项实施策略。

结论

NitL基本按计划执行,似乎值得在社区护理实践中进一步应用。然而,建议进行调整,以使NitL在增强社区护士实施循证实践的领导力方面在实践中更具前景。

相似文献

1
Process evaluation of a programme to empower community nurse leadership.
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 12;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00650-y.
2
The content of the nurses in the lead programme for empowering community nurse leadership in implementing evidence.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Apr 5;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-08-2020-0063.
3
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.
2
The State of the Evidence about the Family and Community Nurse: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 6;19(7):4382. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074382.

本文引用的文献

1
The content of the nurses in the lead programme for empowering community nurse leadership in implementing evidence.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Apr 5;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-08-2020-0063.
3
Formative Process Evaluation of the "Connect" Physical Activity Feasibility Trial for Adolescents.
Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2020 Jun 3;14:1179556520918902. doi: 10.1177/1179556520918902. eCollection 2020.
4
An integrative review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice.
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2378-2392. doi: 10.1111/jan.14092. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
5
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
7
Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Dec 15;16(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0273-5.
8
Factors associated with ADL/IADL disability in community dwelling older adults in the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA).
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Apr;39(8):809-816. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1161848. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
9
Community- and hospital-based nurses' implementation of evidence-based practice: are there any differences?
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Mar;21(3):148-54. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.3.148.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验