Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Retina Disorders and Ophthalmic Genetics, Stein Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eye (Lond). 2022 Aug;36(8):1560-1566. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01670-3. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
To evaluate the ability of retro mode illumination imaging for quantifying atrophy compared to confocal color fundus photography (c-CFP), green light fundus autofluorescence (G-FAF), blue light fundus autofluorescence (B-FAF) using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) Mirante device by Nidek (Nidek Co., Ltd, Gamogori, Japan).
Eyes with clinical evidence of geographic atrophy (GA) associated with non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration, evaluated at the Doheny Eye Centers-UCLA and Hospital Sacco Milan, were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. All eyes were imaged with multiple retinal imaging modalities using the SLO Nidek Mirante device: c-CFP, G-FAF, B-FAF, retro mode illumination deviated-right (RMDR), and deviated-left (RMDL). Masked graders measured the GA lesion on each modality and inter-modality and inter-grader repeatability were assessed.
The mean (SD) area of GA measured 9.76 (3.82) mm, 9.75 (3.91) mm, 9.76 (3.92) mm, 9.82 (3.87) mm, and 9.81 (3.86) mm using c-CFP, G-FAF, B-FAF, RMDR, and RMDL, respectively (p = 0.2). Inter-modality correlation was high (Pearson's r > 0.9 and p < 0.0001). Agreement between graders was excellent for all modalities.
Retro mode imaging demonstrated good agreement for measuring GA compared to other imaging modalities, with a high level of repeatability. Given that retro mode imaging uses infrared light and is comfortable, it may prove to be a useful tool for the assessment of GA in the clinic.
评估 Retro 模式照明成像定量评估萎缩的能力,与共焦彩色眼底照相术(c-CFP)、绿光眼底自发荧光(G-FAF)、蓝光眼底自发荧光(B-FAF)比较,采用 Nidek 公司(日本群马县前桥市)的扫描激光检眼镜(SLO)Mirante 设备。
本前瞻性、横断面研究纳入了在 Doheny Eye Centers-UCLA 和米兰 Sacco 医院就诊、有临床证据的与非新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性相关的地图样萎缩(GA)的患者。所有患者均使用 SLO Nidek Mirante 设备进行多种视网膜成像模式成像:c-CFP、G-FAF、B-FAF、右偏离 Retro 模式照明(RMDR)和左偏离 Retro 模式照明(RMDL)。掩蔽分级员在每种模式和各模式之间测量 GA 病变,评估重复性。
GA 的平均(标准差)面积在 c-CFP、G-FAF、B-FAF、RMDR 和 RMDL 中分别为 9.76(3.82)mm、9.75(3.91)mm、9.76(3.92)mm、9.82(3.87)mm 和 9.81(3.86)mm(p=0.2)。各模式之间的相关性较高(Pearson r>0.9,p<0.0001)。所有模式的分级员之间的一致性均很好。
Retro 模式成像在评估 GA 方面与其他成像模式相比具有良好的一致性,重复性高。鉴于 Retro 模式成像使用红外线且舒适,它可能成为评估 GA 的有用工具。