Department of Psychology, University of Limerick.
Social Psychology & Cognition Lab, University of Limerick (SOCOUL).
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):131-152. doi: 10.1177/1745691621990636. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
Observed variability and complexity of judgments of "right" and "wrong" cannot be readily accounted for within extant approaches to understanding moral judgment. In response to this challenge, we present a novel perspective on categorization in moral judgment. Moral judgment as categorization (MJAC) incorporates principles of category formation research while addressing key challenges of existing approaches to moral judgment. People develop skills in making context-relevant categorizations. They learn that various objects (events, behaviors, people, etc.) can be categorized as morally right or wrong. Repetition and rehearsal result in reliable, habitualized categorizations. According to this skill-formation account of moral categorization, the learning and the habitualization of the forming of moral categories occur within goal-directed activity that is sensitive to various contextual influences. By allowing for the complexity of moral judgments, MJAC offers greater explanatory power than existing approaches while also providing opportunities for a diverse range of new research questions.
在现有的理解道德判断的方法中,无法轻易解释和说明“对”与“错”判断的可变性和复杂性。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一种关于道德判断分类的新视角。道德判断即分类(MJAC)在整合类别形成研究原则的同时,也解决了现有道德判断方法的关键挑战。人们在做出与情境相关的分类方面发展出了相应技能。他们认识到各种对象(事件、行为、人等)可以被归类为道德上的“对”或“错”。通过重复和练习,人们形成了可靠的、习惯化的分类。根据这种道德分类的技能形成理论,道德分类的形成是在目标导向活动中进行的,该活动对各种情境影响具有敏感性,从而实现了对道德类别的学习和习惯化。通过允许道德判断的复杂性存在,MJAC 比现有方法具有更大的解释力,同时也为各种新的研究问题提供了机会。