Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jul 16;28(4):2699-2707. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040235.
Palliative care has an interdisciplinary tradition and Canada is a leader in its research and practice. Yet even in Canada, a full interdisciplinary complement is often lacking, with psychosocial presence ranging from 0-67.4% depending on the discipline and region. We sought to examine the most notable gaps in care from the perspective of Canadian palliative professionals. Canadian directors of palliative care programs were surveyed with respect to interdisciplinary integration. Participants responded in writing or by phone interview. We operationalized reports of interdisciplinary professions as either "present" or "under/not-represented". The Vaismoradi, Turunen, and Bondas' procedure was used for content analysis. Our 14 participants consisted of physicians (85.7%), nurses (14.3%), and a social worker (7.1%) from Ontario (35.7%), British Columbia (14.3%), Alberta (14.3%), Quebec (14.3%), Nova Scotia (14.3%), and New Brunswick (7.1%). Psychology and social work were equally and most frequently reported as "under/not represented" (5/14, each). All participants reported the presence of medical professionals (physicians and nurses) and these groups were not reported as under/not represented. Spiritual care and others (e.g., rehabilitation and volunteers) were infrequently reported as "under/not represented". Qualitative themes included Commonly Represented Disciplines, Quality of Multidisciplinary Collaboration, Commonly Under-Represented Disciplines, and Special Concern: Psychosocial Care. Similar to previous reports, we found that (1) psychology was under-represented yet highly valued and (2) despite social work's relative high presence in care, our participants reported a higher need for more. These finding highlight those psychosocial gaps in care are most frequently noted by palliative care professionals, especially psychology and social work. We speculate on barriers and enablers to addressing this need.
缓和医疗具有跨学科的传统,加拿大在其研究和实践方面处于领先地位。然而,即使在加拿大,也往往缺乏完整的跨学科团队,根据学科和地区的不同,心理社会服务的存在率在 0-67.4%之间。我们试图从加拿大缓和医疗专业人员的角度来考察护理中最显著的差距。我们对加拿大缓和医疗项目的负责人进行了关于跨学科整合的调查。参与者以书面或电话访谈的形式作出回应。我们将跨学科专业人员的报告操作化为“存在”或“不存在/未代表”。我们采用 Vaismoradi、Turunen 和 Bondas 的程序进行内容分析。我们的 14 名参与者包括来自安大略省(35.7%)、不列颠哥伦比亚省(14.3%)、艾伯塔省(14.3%)、魁北克省(14.3%)、新斯科舍省(14.3%)和新不伦瑞克省(7.1%)的医生(85.7%)、护士(14.3%)和一名社工(7.1%)。心理学和社工同样被报告为“不存在/未代表”的频率最高(各 5/14)。所有参与者都报告了医疗专业人员(医生和护士)的存在,这些群体没有被报告为不存在/未代表。精神关怀和其他领域(如康复和志愿者)则很少被报告为“不存在/未代表”。定性主题包括常见的代表学科、多学科合作的质量、常见的代表不足学科和特殊关注:心理社会关怀。与之前的报告相似,我们发现(1)心理学的代表性不足,但却受到高度重视;(2)尽管社工在护理中相对较为常见,但我们的参与者报告说,对更多社工的需求更高。这些发现突显了心理社会关怀差距是缓和医疗专业人员最常注意到的问题,尤其是心理学和社工。我们推测了满足这一需求的障碍和促成因素。