Al-Samawy Sarah, Varughese Nisha, Vaillancourt Regis, Wang Xiao Yu William, Penm Jonathan
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, 101 Currie St, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Jul 1;9(3):122. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030122.
The objectives of this study are to describe opioid stewardship practices in hospitals being implemented globally, in addition to investigating the attitudes and perceptions of health professionals regarding opioid stewardship in the hospital setting.
A survey was developed by the research team to ask about participants' attitudes and perceptions regarding opioid stewardship practices. The survey was piloted for performance by five independent third-party healthcare professionals prior to being made available online, being hosted using Research Electronic Data Capture software, with invitations distributed by the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). Descriptive analyses were used to describe the features of the study, and responses obtained from the survey were further categorised into subgroups separating answers relating to attitudes and perceptions, and policies and regulations.
Overall, there were 50 respondents from 18 countries, representing an 8% response rate from the FIP hospital pharmacy section mailing list. In total, 33/50 (66%) participants agreed opioids are overused nationally, with 22/49 (45%) agreeing they are overused at their workplace. Furthermore, 32/50 (64%) agreed the opioid crisis is a significant problem nationally, and 44/50 (88%) agreed opioid stewardship would reduce problems associated with the opioid crisis. Policies to educate providers about safe opioid prescribing were uncommon, not exhibited in 26/46 (57%) of hospitals, with all EMR and SE Asia hospitals not displaying this policy. Policy for investigation of narcotic discrepancies was present in 34/46 (74%) of hospitals, and there was a policy for reporting discrepancies at 33/46 (72%) hospitals.
In conclusion, healthcare professionals in the American region are more likely to perceive the opioid crisis as a problem, as opposed to those from the European region. Regardless of the presence or absence of a crisis, the implementation of further opioid education and stewardship practices are necessary globally and will contribute to safer prescribing and utilisation practices in hospitals.
本研究的目的是描述全球范围内医院实施的阿片类药物管理实践,此外还调查卫生专业人员对医院环境中阿片类药物管理的态度和看法。
研究团队设计了一项调查问卷,询问参与者对阿片类药物管理实践的态度和看法。该调查问卷在通过研究电子数据采集软件在线发布之前,由五名独立的第三方医疗保健专业人员进行了预测试,邀请由国际制药联合会(FIP)分发。描述性分析用于描述研究的特征,从调查问卷中获得的回复进一步分为子组,将与态度和看法、政策和法规相关的答案分开。
总体而言,有来自18个国家的50名受访者,占FIP医院药房部门邮件列表8%的回复率。总共有33/50(66%)的参与者认为阿片类药物在全国范围内被过度使用,22/49(45%)的参与者认为它们在其工作场所被过度使用。此外,32/50(64%)的人认为阿片类药物危机在全国是一个重大问题,44/50(88%)的人认为阿片类药物管理将减少与阿片类药物危机相关的问题。向提供者提供安全阿片类药物处方教育的政策并不常见,26/46(57%)的医院未展示该政策,所有电子病历和东南亚医院均未展示该政策。34/46(74%)的医院有麻醉药品差异调查政策,33/46(72%)的医院有差异报告政策。
总之,与欧洲地区的医疗保健专业人员相比,美洲地区的医疗保健专业人员更有可能将阿片类药物危机视为一个问题。无论是否存在危机,在全球范围内实施进一步的阿片类药物教育和管理实践都是必要的,这将有助于医院更安全的处方和使用实践。