Haycock Jenny, Grivell Nicole, Redman Anne, Saini Bandana, Vakulin Andrew, Lack Leon, Lovato Nicole, Sweetman Alexander, Zwar Nicholas, Stocks Nigel, Frank Oliver, Mukherjee Sutapa, Adams Robert, McEvoy R Doug, Hoon Elizabeth
National Centre for Sleep Health Services Research, Adelaide, Australia.
FHMRI Sleep Health/Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 22;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01510-z.
Chronic insomnia is a highly prevalent disorder, with ten to thirty percent of Australian adults reporting chronic difficulties falling asleep and/or staying asleep such that it causes significant daytime impairment. Current Australian general practice guidelines recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) as first line treatment for insomnia, however research suggests that most general practice consultations for insomnia result in a prescription for hypnotic or sedative medicines. Although the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms of insomnia is often general practice, little is known about the current role, experiences and capacity of Australian general practitioners to manage insomnia. This study aimed to address that gap by exploring the attitudes and opinions of general practitioners regarding insomnia management, to inform the development and implementation of new models of best practice insomnia care within general practice.
A descriptive, pragmatic qualitative study. Purposive sampling was used to recruit practising Australian general practitioners, varying in age, years of experience and geographic location. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight general practitioners participated in the study. Three major themes were identified: 1) Responsibility for insomnia care; 2) Complexities in managing insomnia; and 3) Navigating treatment pathways. Whilst general practitioners readily accepted responsibility for the management of insomnia, provision of care was often demanding and difficult within the funding and time constraints of general practice. Patients presenting with comorbid mental health conditions and insomnia, and decision-making regarding long-term use of benzodiazepines presented challenges for general practitioners. Whilst general practitioners confidently provided sleep hygiene education to patients, their knowledge and experience of CBTi, and access and understanding of specialised referral pathways for insomnia was limited. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners report that whilst assessing and managing insomnia can be demanding, it is an integral part of general practice. Insomnia presents complexities for general practitioners. Greater clarity about funding options, targeted education about effective insomnia treatments, and referral pathways to specialist services, such as benzodiazepine withdrawal support and psychologists, would benefit insomnia management within general practice.
慢性失眠是一种高度普遍的疾病,10%至30%的澳大利亚成年人报告称存在慢性入睡困难和/或睡眠维持困难的问题,这导致了严重的日间功能损害。澳大利亚现行的全科医疗指南推荐失眠认知行为疗法(CBTi)作为失眠的一线治疗方法,然而研究表明,大多数因失眠进行的全科医疗咨询最终都开具了催眠或镇静药物的处方。尽管失眠症状患者通常首先会联系全科医疗,但对于澳大利亚全科医生目前在管理失眠方面的作用、经验和能力知之甚少。本研究旨在通过探索全科医生对失眠管理的态度和意见来填补这一空白,为全科医疗中最佳实践失眠护理新模式的开发和实施提供信息。
一项描述性、务实的定性研究。采用目的抽样法招募不同年龄、经验年限和地理位置的澳大利亚执业全科医生。进行半结构化访谈,并使用主题分析法对数据进行分析。
28名全科医生参与了该研究。确定了三个主要主题:1)失眠护理的责任;2)管理失眠的复杂性;3)选择治疗途径。虽然全科医生欣然接受管理失眠患者的责任,但在全科医疗的资金和时间限制下,提供护理往往要求很高且困难重重。患有合并心理健康状况和失眠的患者,以及关于长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物的决策给全科医生带来了挑战。虽然全科医生自信地为患者提供睡眠卫生教育,但他们对CBTi的知识和经验,以及对失眠专科转诊途径的了解和获取有限。
全科医生报告称,虽然评估和管理失眠可能要求很高,但它是全科医疗的一个组成部分。失眠给全科医生带来了复杂性。更明确的资金选择、关于有效失眠治疗的针对性教育以及向专科服务的转诊途径,如苯二氮䓬类药物戒断支持和心理医生,将有利于全科医疗中的失眠管理。