• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接喉镜与视频喉镜用于急诊插管的随机对照试验研究

Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy in Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Control Trial Study.

作者信息

Sanguanwit Pitsucha, Yuksen Chaiyaporn, Laowattana Nishapa

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021 Jul;9(3):118-124. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.89922.1240.

DOI:10.30476/BEAT.2021.89922.1240
PMID:34307701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8286653/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intubation success rate of the first attempt between Video Laryngoscopy (VDL) and Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This is a study of a randomized control trial includes the patients with acute respiratory failure and the emergency physician who intended to perform intubation in the ED from July 2015 to June 2016. We were selected the patients randomly by the sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes technique and were assigned to undergo the first attempt of either VDL (n=78) or DL (n=80). We collected the data information regarding the demographic characteristics, predictors of difficult intubation, rapid sequence intubation, attempt, Cormack-Lehane view, and immediate complications.

RESULTS

The success of VDL in the first attempt was 73.1%, which were tended to be better than DL (58.8%) (=0.060). Glottis view (Cormack-Lehane view 1-2) of VDL was significantly better (88.5%) than of DL (72.5%) (=0.010). The immediate complications were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

VDL showed a trend of better success than DL. VDL can increase the first-attempt intubation success and provide a better glottis view in emergency intubation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry, identifier TCTR 20200503003. Registered 16 June 2020, 'Retrospectively registered', http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&smenu=fulltext&task=search&task2=view1&id=6186.

摘要

目的

比较视频喉镜(VDL)和直接喉镜(DL)在急诊科(ED)首次插管成功率。

方法

这是一项随机对照试验研究,纳入了2015年7月至2016年6月在ED有急性呼吸衰竭且拟行插管的患者及急诊医生。我们采用顺序编号的不透明密封信封技术随机选择患者,并将其分为两组,分别接受VDL(n = 78)或DL(n = 80)首次尝试插管。我们收集了有关人口统计学特征、困难插管预测因素、快速顺序插管、尝试次数、Cormack-Lehane喉镜视野分级及即刻并发症的数据信息。

结果

VDL首次尝试成功率为73.1%,倾向于优于DL(58.8%)(P = 0.060)。VDL的声门视野(Cormack-Lehane视野分级1 - 2级)明显优于DL(88.5%对72.5%)(P = 0.010)。即刻并发症无差异。

结论

VDL显示出比DL有更好成功趋势。VDL可提高急诊插管首次尝试成功率并提供更好的声门视野。

试验注册

该试验在泰国临床试验注册中心注册,标识符为TCTR 20200503003。于2020年6月16日注册,“回顾性注册”,网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&smenu=fulltext&task=search&task2=view1&id=6186 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/a6bd0447d505/bet-9-118-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/30510a4647e7/bet-9-118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/b22379aa6e10/bet-9-118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/024900bc5d65/bet-9-118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/a6bd0447d505/bet-9-118-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/30510a4647e7/bet-9-118-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/b22379aa6e10/bet-9-118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/024900bc5d65/bet-9-118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f8/8286653/a6bd0447d505/bet-9-118-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy in Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Control Trial Study.直接喉镜与视频喉镜用于急诊插管的随机对照试验研究
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021 Jul;9(3):118-124. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.89922.1240.
2
[Clinical study of SMT-Ⅱ video laryngoscope with difficult airway intubation in emergency department].SMT-Ⅱ可视喉镜在急诊科困难气道插管中的临床研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 1;55(7):549-553. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.07.014.
3
A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.比较 C-MAC 视频喉镜与 Macintosh 直接喉镜在急诊科插管中的应用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.03.031. Epub 2012 May 5.
4
Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol.全麻下 2000 例患者行气管插管中 McGrath MAC 和 Macintosh 喉镜的评价:随机多中心 EMMA 试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016907.
5
Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.使用C-MAC PM视频喉镜作为院外紧急气管插管的一线设备改善声门可视化:一项观察性研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jun;32(6):425-31. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000249.
6
C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.急诊室中C-MAC视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于快速顺序插管的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):943-948. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000525.
7
Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation of blunt trauma patients in the ED.在急诊科对钝性创伤患者进行气管插管时,比较C-MAC视频喉镜与Macintosh喉镜的效果。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb 22;16(2):53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2016.02.001. eCollection 2016 Jun.
8
Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.视频喉镜与增强型直接喉镜在成人急诊科气管插管中的比较:国家急诊气道登记研究(NEAR)。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;27(2):100-108. doi: 10.1111/acem.13851. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
9
A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.非通道型King视可尼喉镜、麦格拉斯MAC视频喉镜与麦金托什直接喉镜用于预计插管困难患者鼻气管插管的随机对照比较
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 31;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0838-z.
10
Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a pilot randomized trial.视频喉镜与直接喉镜在危重症患者中的比较:一项初步随机试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;59(11):1032-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9775-8. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.危重症患者视频喉镜与直接喉镜检查的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 15;30(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02525-3.
2
Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization.视频喉镜用于气管插管:关于不使用颈托进行手动轴向稳定与完全固定的考量
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jan 25;21:103-109. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S486978. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Intubation of non-difficult airways using video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a randomized, parallel-group study.视频喉镜与直接喉镜在非困难气道插管中的应用:一项随机、平行组研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 May 15;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0737-3.
2
Video laryngoscopy does not improve the intubation outcomes in emergency and critical patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.视频喉镜在急诊和危重症患者中的插管效果并不改善——一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2017 Nov 24;21(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1885-9.
3
Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins.
Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in achieving successful emergency endotracheal intubations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
视频喉镜与直接喉镜在急诊经口气管插管中成功率的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 12;13(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02500-9.
4
Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for intubation success in critically ill patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于危重症患者插管成功率的比较:一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 9;10:1193514. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1193514. eCollection 2023.
5
Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.视频喉镜与直接喉镜在危重症成人气管插管中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 3;389(5):418-429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301601. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
6
Impact of VieScope® on first-attempt success during simulated COVID-19 patients intubation: A randomized cross-over simulation trial.VieScope® 在模拟 COVID-19 患者插管中首次尝试成功的影响:一项随机交叉模拟试验。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Apr;29(4):463-470. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.45682.
7
DirEct versus VIdeo LaryngosCopE (DEVICE): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial in critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation.直接喉镜与可视喉镜(DEVICE):一项在接受紧急气管插管的危重症成人中进行的随机临床试验的方案和统计分析计划。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 13;13(1):e068978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068978.
8
Development of endotracheal intubation devices for patients with tumors.用于肿瘤患者的气管插管装置的研发。
Am J Cancer Res. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):2433-2446. eCollection 2022.
9
Difficult Laryngoscopy Prediction Score for Intubation in Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科气管插管困难喉镜检查预测评分:一项回顾性队列研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 29;14:311-322. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S372768. eCollection 2022.
10
Success Rate on Endotracheal Intubation with Prone versus Kneeling Position in Mannequin Model with Limitation of Neck Movement: A Cross Over Study.颈部活动受限的人体模型中俯卧位与跪姿行气管插管的成功率:一项交叉研究
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 19;14:177-182. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S360169. eCollection 2022.
在无经验使用者中使用视频喉镜可提高成功率:气道模型中的随机交叉研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2017 Aug 10;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40001-017-0268-7.
4
Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.视频喉镜用于危重症成年患者气管插管的随机试验
Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):1980-1987. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001841.
5
Strategies to improve first attempt success at intubation in critically ill patients.提高危重症患者插管首次成功率的策略。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117 Suppl 1:i60-i68. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew061. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
Comparative analysis of airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation primarily for cardiac arrest in prehospital setting.院前心肺复苏中气道显露范围和 Macintosh 喉镜用于插管的对比分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.026. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
7
A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation.视频喉镜在经口气管插管中作用的系统评价
BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Dec 14;12:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-32.
8
Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy.急诊科困难气道管理:GlideScope视频喉镜与直接喉镜的比较。
J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):629-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
9
Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于气管插管的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):788-95. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a34f3.
10
Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature.视频喉镜在成人气道管理中的应用:文献综述
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Oct;54(9):1050-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02285.x. Epub 2010 Jul 28.