Suppr超能文献

口腔内扫描仪获取数字化种植体印模的准确性和精确性:文献综述。

Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 27;7(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00352-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the development of intraoral scanners, their trueness and precision have been evaluated in various studies. Through these studies, the amount of accuracy that can be expected from intraoral scanners has gradually been disclosed, at the same time, it was difficult to integrate the results of individual studies due to differences in evaluation methods between studies. The purpose of this article was to review the currently available evidence, summarise what is currently known about IOS, analyse the evaluation methods of each study, and list points to note when interpreting the results.

MAIN TEXT

Most of the studies were conducted in vitro. The accuracy is evaluated in situations such as single missing teeth, partially edentulous ridges with multiple missing teeth, and fully edentulous jaws. To evaluate the accuracy, direct measurement of distance or angle by coordinate measuring machines and calculation of surface deviation by superimposing surface data were predominantly performed. The influence of parameters such as the number of implants, distance between implants, angle between implants, and experience of the operator was evaluated. Many studies have shown that trueness tends to decrease as the distance between the implants and the scan range increases. It was agreed that the implant angle did not affect either trueness or precision. Regarding other factors, the results varied among studies. Therefore, the effects of these parameters are not clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneity in the research methodology was prevalent among the studies considered in this review. Therefore, we cannot make a decisive statement regarding the trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by IOSs. So far, the comparison of the numerical values of error between studies has yet to elucidate any clear answers, despite small methodological differences.

摘要

背景

随着口内扫描仪的发展,其准确性和精度已在各种研究中进行了评估。通过这些研究,逐渐揭示了口内扫描仪可以达到的精度水平,但由于研究之间评估方法的差异,难以整合各个研究的结果。本文的目的是回顾现有的证据,总结目前已知的关于 IOS 的信息,分析每个研究的评估方法,并列出解释结果时需要注意的要点。

正文

大多数研究都是在体外进行的。准确性是在单个缺牙、多个缺牙的部分无牙颌以及完全无牙颌等情况下进行评估的。为了评估准确性,主要通过坐标测量机进行距离或角度的直接测量,并通过叠加表面数据来计算表面偏差。评估了参数的影响,如种植体的数量、种植体之间的距离、种植体之间的角度以及操作人员的经验等。许多研究表明,随着种植体之间的距离和扫描范围的增加,准确性往往会降低。一致认为种植体角度不会影响准确性或精度。关于其他因素,研究结果各不相同。因此,这些参数的影响尚不清楚。

结论

本综述中考虑的研究在研究方法学方面存在很大的异质性。因此,我们不能对 IOS 进行数字化种植体印模的准确性和精度做出明确的结论。到目前为止,尽管存在微小的方法学差异,但研究之间的误差数值比较仍未阐明任何明确的答案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6995/8313656/caecf30bb8d1/40729_2021_352_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验