Šimkovic Matuš, Träuble Birgit
Department Psychologie, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 15;9:e11771. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11771. eCollection 2021.
Additive and multiplicative regression models of habituation were compared regarding the fit to looking times from a habituation experiment with infants aged between 3 and 11 months. In contrast to earlier studies, the current study considered multiple probability distributions, namely Weibull, gamma, lognormal and normal distribution. In the habituation experiment the type of contrast between the habituation and the test trial was varied (luminance, color or orientation contrast), crossed with the number of habituation trials (1, 3, 5, or 7 habituation trials) and crossed with three age cohorts (4, 7, 10 months). The initial mean LT to dark stimuli (around 3.7 s) was considerably shorter than the mean LT to green and gray stimuli (around 5 s). Infants showed the strongest dishabituation to changes from dark to bright (luminance contrast) and weak-to-no dishabituation to a 90-degrees rotation of the gray stimuli (orientation contrast). The dishabituation was stronger after five and seven habituation trials, but the result was not statistically robust. The gamma distribution showed the best fit in terms of log-likelihood and mean absolute error and the best predictive performance. Furthermore, the gamma distribution showed small correlations between parameters relative to other models. The normal additive model showed an inferior fit and medium correlations between the parameters. In particular, the positive correlation between the initial looking time (LT) and the habituation rate was likely responsible for a different interpretation relative to the multiplicative models of the main effect of age on the habituation rate. Otherwise, the additive and multiplicative models provided similar statistical conclusions. The performance of the model versions without pooling and with partial pooling across participants (also called random-effects, multi-level or hierarchical models) were compared. The latter type of models showed worse data fit but more precise predictions and reduced correlations between the parameters. The performance of model variants with auto-regressive time structures were explored but showed considerably worse fit. The performance of quadratic models that allowed non-monotonic changes in LTs were investigated as well. However, when fitted with LT data, these models did not produce non-monotonic change in LTs. The study underscores the utility of partial-pooling models in terms of providing more accurate predictions. Further, it agrees with previous research in that a multiplicative LT model is preferable. Nevertheless, the current results suggest that the impact of the choice of an additive model on the statistical inference is less dramatic then previously assumed.
针对3至11个月大婴儿的习惯化实验中的注视时间拟合情况,对习惯化的加法回归模型和乘法回归模型进行了比较。与早期研究不同,本研究考虑了多种概率分布,即威布尔分布、伽马分布、对数正态分布和正态分布。在习惯化实验中,习惯化试验与测试试验之间的对比类型有所不同(亮度、颜色或方向对比),并与习惯化试验的次数(1、3、5或7次习惯化试验)交叉,还与三个年龄组(4、7、10个月)交叉。对黑暗刺激的初始平均注视时间(约3.7秒)明显短于对绿色和灰色刺激的平均注视时间(约5秒)。婴儿对从黑暗到明亮的变化(亮度对比)表现出最强的去习惯化,而对灰色刺激90度旋转(方向对比)表现出弱至无去习惯化。在进行五次和七次习惯化试验后,去习惯化更强,但结果在统计上并不稳健。就对数似然和平均绝对误差而言,伽马分布显示出最佳拟合以及最佳预测性能。此外,相对于其他模型,伽马分布的参数之间显示出较小的相关性。正态加法模型显示出较差的拟合以及参数之间的中等相关性。特别是,初始注视时间(LT)与习惯化率之间的正相关可能导致对年龄对习惯化率的主要影响的乘法模型有不同的解释。否则,加法模型和乘法模型提供了相似的统计结论。比较了不进行合并以及在参与者之间进行部分合并的模型版本(也称为随机效应、多级或分层模型)的性能。后一种类型的模型显示出更差的数据拟合,但预测更精确且参数之间的相关性降低。还探索了具有自回归时间结构的模型变体的性能,但显示出拟合情况要差得多。也研究了允许注视时间非单调变化的二次模型的性能。然而,当用注视时间数据进行拟合时,这些模型并未产生注视时间的非单调变化。该研究强调了部分合并模型在提供更准确预测方面的效用。此外,它与先前的研究一致,即乘法注视时间模型更可取。尽管如此,当前结果表明,加法模型的选择对统计推断的影响不如先前假设的那么显著。