Meyer Carly, Waite Monique, Atkins Jenny, Ekberg Katie, Scarinci Nerina, Barr Caitlin, Cowan Robert, Hickson Louise
HEARing CRC, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):335-346. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001097.
To seek the perspectives of key stakeholders regarding: (1) how eHealth could help meet the hearing and communication needs of adults with hearing impairment and their significant others; and (2) how helpful each aspect of eHealth would be to key stakeholders personally.
Group concept mapping, a mixed-methods participatory research method, was used to seek the perspectives of key stakeholders: adults with hearing impairment (n = 39), significant others (n = 28), and hearing care professionals (n = 56). All participants completed a short online survey before completing one or more of the following activities: brainstorming, sorting, and rating. Brainstorming required participants to generate ideas in response to the focus prompt, "One way I would like to use information and communication technologies to address the hearing and communication needs of adults with hearing loss and their family and friends is to…." The sorting task required participants to sort all statements into groups that made sense to them. Finally, the rating task required participants to rate each of the statements according to "How helpful would this idea be to you?" using a 5-point Likert scale. Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to the "sorting" data to develop a cluster map using the Concept Systems software. The "rating" data were subsequently analyzed at a cluster level and an individual-item level using descriptive statistics. Differences in cluster ratings between stakeholder groups were examined using Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Overall, 123 statements were generated by participants in response to the focus prompt and were included in subsequent analyses. Based on the "sorting" data and hierarchical cluster analysis, a seven-cluster map was deemed to be the best representation of the data. Three key themes emerged from the data, including using eHealth to (1) Educate and Involve Others; (2) Support Aural Rehabilitation; and (3) Educate About and Demonstrate the Impacts of Hearing Impairment and Benefits of Hearing Rehabilitation. Overall median rating scores for each cluster ranged from 3.97 (educate and involve significant others) to 3.44 (empower adults with hearing impairment to manage their hearing impairment from home).
These research findings demonstrate the broad range of clinical applications of eHealth that have the capacity to support the implementation of patient- and family-centered hearing care, with self-directed educational tools and resources typically being rated as most helpful. Therefore, eHealth appears to be a viable option for enabling a more biopsychosocial approach to hearing healthcare and educating and involving significant others in the hearing rehabilitation process without adding more pressure on clinical time. More research is needed to inform the subsequent development of eHealth interventions, and it is recommended that health behavior change theory be adhered to for such interventions.
了解关键利益相关者对于以下方面的看法:(1)电子健康如何有助于满足听力受损成年人及其重要他人的听力和沟通需求;(2)电子健康的各个方面对关键利益相关者个人有多大帮助。
采用小组概念映射法,这是一种混合方法参与式研究方法,以了解关键利益相关者的看法:听力受损成年人(n = 39)、重要他人(n = 28)和听力保健专业人员(n = 56)。所有参与者在完成以下一项或多项活动之前,先完成一份简短的在线调查:头脑风暴、分类和评分。头脑风暴要求参与者针对焦点提示“我希望使用信息和通信技术来满足听力损失成年人及其家人和朋友的听力和沟通需求的一种方式是……”提出想法。分类任务要求参与者将所有陈述分类成他们认为有意义的组。最后,评分任务要求参与者根据“这个想法对你有多大帮助?”使用5点李克特量表对每个陈述进行评分。应用层次聚类分析对“分类”数据进行分析,使用概念系统软件绘制聚类图。随后使用描述性统计在聚类水平和单个项目水平上分析“评分”数据。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验检查利益相关者群体之间聚类评分的差异。
总体而言,参与者针对焦点提示共提出123条陈述,并纳入后续分析。基于“分类”数据和层次聚类分析,七聚类图被认为是数据的最佳表示形式。数据中出现了三个关键主题,包括使用电子健康来(1)教育和让他人参与;(2)支持听觉康复;(3)教育并展示听力损失的影响和听力康复的益处。每个聚类的总体中位数评分从3.97(教育并让重要他人参与)到3.44(使听力受损成年人有能力在家中管理自己的听力损失)不等。
这些研究结果表明,电子健康具有广泛的临床应用,有能力支持以患者和家庭为中心的听力保健的实施,自我指导的教育工具和资源通常被评为最有帮助。因此,电子健康似乎是一种可行的选择,能够实现更具生物心理社会性质的听力保健方法,并在听力康复过程中教育和让重要他人参与,而不会给临床时间带来更多压力。需要更多研究为电子健康干预措施的后续发展提供信息,建议此类干预措施遵循健康行为改变理论。