Estill Janne, Islam Tauhid, Houben Rein M G J, Rudman Jamie, Ragonnet Romain, McBryde Emma S, Trauer James M, Orel Erol, Nguyen Anh Tuan, Rahevar Kalpeshsinh, Morishita Fukushi, Oh Kyung Hyun, Raviglione Mario C, Keiser Olivia
Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Apr 29;11:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100147. eCollection 2021 Jun.
We aimed to estimate the disease burden of Tuberculosis (TB) and return on investment of TB care in selected high-burden countries of the Western Pacific Region (WPR) until 2030.
We projected the TB epidemic in Viet Nam and Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR) 2020-2030 using a mathematical model under various scenarios: counterfactual (no TB care); baseline (TB care continues at current levels); and 12 different diagnosis and treatment interventions. We retrieved previous modeling results for China and the Philippines. We pooled the new and existing information on incidence and deaths in the four countries, covering >80% of the TB burden in WPR. We estimated the return on investment of TB care and interventions in Viet Nam and Lao PDR using a Solow model.
In the baseline scenario, TB incidence in the four countries decreased from 97•0/100,000/year (2019) to 90•1/100,000/year (2030), and TB deaths from 83,300/year (2019) to 71,100/year (2030). Active case finding (ACF) strategies (screening people not seeking care for respiratory symptoms) were the most effective single interventions. Return on investment (2020-2030) for TB care in Viet Nam and Lao PDR ranged US$4-US$49/dollar spent; additional interventions brought up to US$2•7/dollar spent.
In the modeled countries, TB incidence will only modestly decrease without additional interventions. Interventions that include ACF can reduce TB burden but achieving the End TB incidence and mortality targets will be difficult without new transformational tools (e.g. vaccine, new diagnostic tools, shorter treatment). However, TB care, even at its current level, can bring a multiple-fold return on investment.
World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office; Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 163878.
我们旨在估计西太平洋区域(WPR)部分高负担国家结核病(TB)的疾病负担以及结核病防治的投资回报,直至2030年。
我们使用数学模型在不同情景下预测了越南和老挝人民民主共和国2020 - 2030年的结核病疫情:反事实情景(无结核病防治);基线情景(结核病防治维持当前水平);以及12种不同的诊断和治疗干预措施。我们获取了中国和菲律宾先前的建模结果。我们汇总了这四个国家关于发病率和死亡的新信息与现有信息,这些国家的结核病负担占WPR的80%以上。我们使用索洛模型估计了越南和老挝人民民主共和国结核病防治及干预措施的投资回报。
在基线情景下,四个国家的结核病发病率从2019年的97.0/10万/年降至2030年的90.1/10万/年,结核病死亡人数从2019年的83300人/年降至2030年的71100人/年。主动病例发现(ACF)策略(筛查未因呼吸道症状寻求治疗的人群)是最有效的单一干预措施。越南和老挝人民民主共和国结核病防治的投资回报(2020 - 2030年)为每花费1美元获得4 - 49美元;额外干预措施每花费1美元带来高达2.7美元的回报。
在建模国家中,若无额外干预措施,结核病发病率仅会适度下降。包括ACF在内的干预措施可减轻结核病负担,但若无新的变革性工具(如疫苗、新诊断工具、更短疗程),实现终止结核病发病率和死亡率目标将很困难。然而,结核病防治即使在当前水平也能带来数倍的投资回报。
世界卫生组织西太平洋区域办事处;瑞士国家科学基金会资助项目163878。