Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
National Institute of Nursing Education, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2021 Oct;47(5):332-345. doi: 10.1177/26350106211031809. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
The objectives of this umbrella review were to describe various aspects of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES)-related interventions and their effect on clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes among children and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and identify gaps in current DSMES-related research.
An umbrella review of systematic reviews on DSMES interventions was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 statement. Four international medical databases were searched for eligible review articles published in English in the last 10 years that dealt with children and youths with T1DM and were conducted in accordance with a priori protocol.
Out of the 234 citations screened, only 8 systematic reviews representing 166 studies were considered eligible for further analysis. Glycemic management (A1C) is the most common outcome variable (108 studies). Common behavioral and psychosocial outcome variables examined are episodes of hypoglycemia (27 studies) and diabetic ketoacidosis (21 studies) and self-care behavior and generic quality of life (20 studies each). Several gaps in DSMES-related research studies are identified, including uneven geographical distribution of study population, methodological weaknesses in study designs, missing important outcome variables, use of nonstandardized assessment tools, and lack of assessment of the sustainability of effects.
The effects of DSMES interventions on clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes are varied. The heterogeneity of implementation and evaluation makes it difficult to draw clear conclusions about elements of DSMES that are most effective. There is a need for long-term assessment of the psychosocial and behavioral outcomes using validated and generalizable instruments.
本综述旨在描述 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)患儿和青少年糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)相关干预措施的各个方面及其对临床、行为和心理社会结局的影响,并确定当前 DSMES 相关研究中的空白。
按照 PRISMA 2009 声明,对 DSMES 干预措施的系统综述进行了伞式综述。在过去 10 年中,以英语发表并符合预先制定方案的针对 T1DM 儿童和青少年的研究进行了四项国际医学数据库检索,以寻找合格的综述文章。
在筛选出的 234 条引文,仅有 8 篇系统综述(代表 166 项研究)被认为符合进一步分析的条件。血糖管理(A1C)是最常见的结局变量(108 项研究)。检查的常见行为和心理社会结局变量包括低血糖发作(27 项研究)和糖尿病酮症酸中毒(21 项研究)以及自我护理行为和一般生活质量(各 20 项研究)。确定了与 DSMES 相关研究中的几个空白,包括研究人群的地理分布不均、研究设计的方法学弱点、缺失重要结局变量、使用非标准化评估工具以及缺乏对效果可持续性的评估。
DSMES 干预对临床、行为和心理社会结局的影响是多种多样的。实施和评估的异质性使得难以清楚地得出关于 DSMES 最有效的要素的结论。需要使用经过验证和可推广的工具对心理社会和行为结局进行长期评估。