Farhadi Elham, Kermanshah Hamid, Rafizadeh Shiva, Saeedi Reza, Ranjbar Omrani Ladan
Dentistry Institute, Restorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Dentistry Institute, Restorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 23;2021:9977993. doi: 10.1155/2021/9977993. eCollection 2021.
This study assessed the effect of immersion in acidic solutions and sodium fluoride on surface roughness of dental ceramics.
40 blocks of Vitablocs Mark II and IPS e.max CAD (5 × 5 × 3) were prepared. The samples were divided into five groups ( = 8) for immersion in artificial saliva (control), artificially prepared gastric acid, acetic acid, 0.02% sodium fluoride + gastric acid, and 0.02% sodium fluoride + acetic acid. The samples were immersed for 168 hours in the respective solutions except for sodium fluoride, in which the samples were immersed for 69 hours. The surface roughness of samples was measured before and after immersion using a profilometer. The surface roughness changes of three specimens of each group were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and independent t-test.
Significant changes were noted in Ra (=0.002) and Rq ( < 0.0001) in both types of ceramics. The lowest changes in Ra and Rq parameters were seen in artificial saliva and gastric acid and highest changes occurred following immersion in 0.02% sodium fluoride + acetic acid and 0.02% sodium fluoride + gastric acid, respectively. Changes in Rz were also significant following immersion in Vitablocs Mark II ( < 0.05). Immersion in 0.02% sodium fluoride + gastric acid and 0.02% sodium fluoride + acetic acid produced a rougher surface on both types of ceramics (SEM).
Exposure of Vitablocs Mark II CAD and IPS e.max CAD to 0.02% sodium fluoride + gastric acid and 0.02% sodium fluoride + acetic acid significantly increased their surface roughness, while for Vitablocs Mark II, lager defects were seen on its surface.
本研究评估了浸泡在酸性溶液和氟化钠中对牙科陶瓷表面粗糙度的影响。
制备40块维他瓷块Mark II和IPS e.max CAD(5×5×3)。将样本分为五组(每组 = 8),分别浸泡在人工唾液(对照组)、人工制备的胃酸、乙酸、0.02%氟化钠 + 胃酸以及0.02%氟化钠 + 乙酸中。除氟化钠组样本浸泡69小时外,其余样本均在各自溶液中浸泡168小时。使用轮廓仪在浸泡前后测量样本的表面粗糙度。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估每组三个样本的表面粗糙度变化。数据采用单因素和双因素方差分析、Tukey检验以及独立t检验进行分析。
两种类型的陶瓷在Ra(=0.002)和Rq(<0.0001)方面均出现显著变化。在人工唾液和胃酸中,Ra和Rq参数的变化最小,而分别浸泡在0.02%氟化钠 + 乙酸和0.02%氟化钠 + 胃酸后,变化最大。浸泡在维他瓷块Mark II中后,Rz的变化也具有显著性(<0.05)。浸泡在0.02%氟化钠 + 胃酸和0.02%氟化钠 + 乙酸中会使两种类型的陶瓷表面更粗糙(SEM)。
维他瓷块Mark II CAD和IPS e.max CAD暴露于0.02%氟化钠 + 胃酸和0.02%氟化钠 + 乙酸中会显著增加其表面粗糙度,而对于维他瓷块Mark II,其表面出现了更大的缺陷。