Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 90 Yishun Central, Singapore, 768828, Singapore.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Aug;36(4):1139-1145. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00746-5. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
We compared the hyperangulated McGrath X-blade with the Macintosh-type CMAC videolaryngoscope through the use of manual in-line stabilization on patients. The primary hypothesis was that the McGrath X-blade has a similar first-attempt success rate as the CMAC videolaryngoscope. 210 patients of ASA physical status I to III, aged 21 to 80 years old, undergoing general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation were prospectively recruited into this two-centre randomized controlled trial, from June 2016 to April 2019. Patients with history of or predicted difficult airway, pre-existing dental risks, BMI > 35 kg/m, cervical spondylosis or myelopathy, aspiration risks, patients who declined to participate or lacked the mental capacity to give consent were excluded. Participants were intubated using either hyperangulated McGrath X-blade (MGX) or Macintosh-type CMAC (CM) videolaryngoscopy, with manual in-line stabilization. Primary outcome measured was first-attempt tracheal intubation success. Secondary outcomes included overall successful intubation within 2 attempts or 120 s, time to intubation, glottic view obtained and intubation-related complications. First-attempt success rates were 71.4% in the MGX group vs. 79.0% in the CM group (p = 0.26), with an absolute difference of -7.6% (95%CI -20%, 5.0%, p value = 0.26), but this trial was underpowered to detect a difference. Overall success was 91.4% (MGX) vs. 92.4% (CM) (p > 0.99). The Cormack & Lehane laryngeal grade was superior in the MGX group compared to CM group (Grade I: MGX 44%, CM 23%; Grade II: MGX 53%, CM 45%; Grade III: MGX 3%, CM 32%; p < 0.001). The median time to intubation using the MGX was longer than the CM [MGX 55.5 s (42.1-78.3), CM 43.8 s (38-55.3); p < 0.001]. Our study did not demonstrate a significant difference in efficacy between the McGrath X-blade and the CMAC videolaryngoscope. In patients with manual in-line stabilization, no anticipated airway difficulty and in the hands of experienced operators, the McGrath X-blade provided superior glottic views but conferred no advantage over the C-MAC, with a longer median time to intubation compared to the CMAC videolaryngoscope.Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12616000668404).
我们通过在患者身上使用手动直线稳定技术,比较了超角度麦格(McGrath)X 型刀片和 Macintosh 型 CMAC 视频喉镜。主要假设是 McGrath X 型刀片的首次尝试成功率与 CMAC 视频喉镜相似。2016 年 6 月至 2019 年 4 月,这项在两个中心进行的随机对照试验前瞻性纳入了 210 名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况 I 至 III 级、年龄 21 至 80 岁、需要全身麻醉气管插管的患者。有困难气道史或预计有困难气道、有预先存在的牙齿风险、BMI>35kg/m、颈椎病或脊髓病、有吸入风险、拒绝参与或缺乏同意能力的患者被排除在外。参与者使用超角度麦格(MGX)或 Macintosh 型 CMAC(CM)视频喉镜,并进行手动直线稳定,进行插管。主要结局测量指标为首次尝试气管插管的成功率。次要结局包括 2 次尝试内或 120 秒内总插管成功率、插管时间、获得的声门视图和插管相关并发症。MGX 组首次尝试成功率为 71.4%,CM 组为 79.0%(p=0.26),绝对差值为-7.6%(95%CI-20%,5.0%,p 值=0.26),但本试验的检测能力不足。总体成功率为 91.4%(MGX)与 92.4%(CM)(p>0.99)。与 CM 组相比,MGX 组的 Cormack & Lehane 喉镜分级更高(I 级:MGX 44%,CM 23%;II 级:MGX 53%,CM 45%;III 级:MGX 3%,CM 32%;p<0.001)。使用 MGX 插管的中位数时间长于 CM [MGX 55.5s(42.1-78.3),CM 43.8s(38-55.3);p<0.001]。我们的研究没有显示 McGrath X 刀片和 CMAC 视频喉镜之间在疗效方面有显著差异。在手动直线稳定、无预期气道困难和经验丰富的操作者手中,麦格(McGrath)X 型刀片提供了更好的声门视图,但与 C-MAC 相比,没有优势,与 CMAC 视频喉镜相比,插管中位数时间更长。试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12616000668404)。