Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Imaging of Mood- and Anxiety-Related Disorders (IMARD) group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255292. eCollection 2021.
While multiple studies have examined the brain functional correlates of reward, meta-analyses have either focused on studies using the monetary incentive delay (MID) task, or have adopted a broad strategy, combining data from studies using both monetary and non-monetary reward, as probed using a wide range of tasks.
To meta-analyze fMRI studies that used monetary reward and in which there was a definable cue-reward contingency. Studies were limited to those using monetary reward in order to avoid potential heterogeneity from use of other rewards, especially social rewards. Studies using gambling or delay discounting tasks were excluded on the grounds that reward anticipation is not easily quantifiable.
English-language fMRI studies (i) that reported fMRI findings on healthy adults; (ii) that used monetary reward; and (iii) in which a cue that was predictive of reward was compared to a no win (or lesser win) condition. Only voxel-based studies were included; those where brain coverage was incomplete were excluded.
Ovid, Medline and PsycInfo, from 2000 to 2020, plus checking of review articles and meta-analyses.
Data were pooled using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI). Heterogeneity among studies was examined using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots and statistical examination of asymmetries. Moderator variables including whether the task was pre-learnt, sex distribution, amount of money won and width of smoothing kernel were examined.
Pooled data from 45 studies of reward anticipation revealed activations in the ventral striatum, the middle cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area and the insula. Pooled data from 28 studies of reward delivery again revealed ventral striatal activation, plus cortical activations in the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex. There was relatively little evidence of publication bias. Among moderating variables, only whether the task was pre-learnt exerted an influence.
According to this meta-analysis monetary reward anticipation and delivery both activate the ventral but not the dorsal striatum, and are associated with different patterns of cortical activation.
尽管多项研究已经考察了奖励的大脑功能相关性,但元分析要么侧重于使用货币激励延迟(MID)任务的研究,要么采用广泛的策略,将使用货币和非货币奖励的研究的数据结合起来,使用广泛的任务进行探测。
对使用货币奖励且存在可定义的线索-奖励关联的 fMRI 研究进行元分析。研究仅限于使用货币奖励的研究,以避免使用其他奖励(特别是社会奖励)的潜在异质性。由于奖励预期不容易量化,因此排除了使用赌博或延迟折扣任务的研究。
英语 fMRI 研究(i)报告了健康成年人的 fMRI 结果;(ii)使用货币奖励;(iii)在奖励预测线索与无赢(或更少赢)条件进行比较。只包括基于体素的研究;排除脑覆盖不完全的研究。
2000 年至 2020 年期间的 Ovid、Medline 和 PsycInfo,以及对综述文章和元分析的检查。
使用基于种子的映射与受试者图像置换的 SDM-PSI 对数据进行汇总。使用 I2 统计量检查研究之间的异质性。使用漏斗图和不对称性的统计检验检查发表偏倚。检查了调节变量,包括任务是否预先学习、性别分布、赢得的金额和平滑核的宽度。
汇总了 45 项奖励预期研究的数据,结果显示腹侧纹状体、中扣带回/辅助运动区和岛叶有激活。汇总了 28 项奖励传递研究的数据,再次发现腹侧纹状体激活,以及前扣带回和后扣带回皮质的激活。发表偏倚的证据相对较少。在调节变量中,只有任务是否预先学习对结果有影响。
根据这项元分析,货币奖励预期和传递都激活了腹侧纹状体,但不激活背侧纹状体,并且与不同的皮质激活模式相关。