Chen Yuqiao, Feng Xiu, Qi Chenliang, Zhou Lingfeng, Sun Yi, Gu Zhenhua, Li Xiaolong
Department of Cardiology, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou, China.
Department of Echocardiography, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China.
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;10(7):8082-8093. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1645.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xa inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD).
A systematic electronic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 26, 2019. A total of four randomized controlled trials involving 14,694 patients were included in this meta-analysis.
The meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference between the Xa inhibitor and control group regarding the primary efficacy outcome [rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group: relative risk (RR) 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.01, P=0.06; rivaroxaban 5 mg group: RR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.02, P=0.08]. The risk of the primary safety outcome was significantly increased among patients who received Xa inhibitors compared with the control group (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group: RR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.21-1.98, P=0.0006; rivaroxaban 5 mg group: RR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.30-2.12, P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the risk of cardiovascular death between the Xa inhibitor and control group (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group: RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.54-1.14, P=0.21; rivaroxaban 5 mg group: RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.73-1.08, P=0.24). The risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in the rivaroxaban 5 mg group was significantly lower than that of the control group (RR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99, P=0.04). However, the risk of MI in the rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group was similar to that of the control group (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71-1.01, P=0.07).
Xa inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding among HF and CAD or PAD patients. Therefore, Xa inhibitors should be used cautiously in patients with HF and CAD or PAD.
评估Xa因子抑制剂在心力衰竭(HF)合并冠状动脉疾病(CAD)或外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者中的疗效和安全性。
使用PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统的电子文献检索,检索时间从建库至2019年6月26日。本荟萃分析共纳入四项随机对照试验,涉及14694例患者。
荟萃分析显示,在主要疗效结局方面,Xa因子抑制剂组与对照组之间无统计学差异[利伐沙班2.5mg组:相对危险度(RR)0.82,95%置信区间(CI):0.66 - 1.01,P = 0.06;利伐沙班5mg组:RR 0.86,95%CI:0.73 - 1.02,P = 0.08]。与对照组相比,接受Xa因子抑制剂治疗的患者主要安全结局风险显著增加(利伐沙班2.5mg组:RR 1.55,95%CI:1.21 - 1.98,P = 0.0006;利伐沙班5mg组:RR 1.66,95%CI:1.30 - 2.12,P < 0.0001)。Xa因子抑制剂组与对照组在心血管死亡风险方面无显著差异(利伐沙班2.5mg组:RR 0.79,95%CI:0.54 - 1.14,P = 0.21;利伐沙班5mg组:RR 0.89,95%CI:0.73 - 1.08,P = 0.24)。利伐沙班5mg组心肌梗死(MI)风险显著低于对照组(RR 0.83,95%CI:0.69 - 0.99,P = 0.04)。然而,利伐沙班2.5mg组的MI风险与对照组相似(RR 0.85,95%CI:0.71 - 1.01,P = 0.07)。
Xa因子抑制剂与HF合并CAD或PAD患者发生主要不良心血管事件和出血的较高风险相关。因此,在HF合并CAD或PAD患者中应谨慎使用Xa因子抑制剂。