Suppr超能文献

性少数群体前列腺癌幸存者研究中自我报告的格里森评分的可靠性

The Reliability of Self-Reported Gleason Scores in Studies of Sexual Minority Prostate Cancer Survivors.

作者信息

Rosser B R Simon, Konety Badrinath R, Capistrant Benjamin D, Kapoor Aditya, Polter Elizabeth

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Urol Pract. 2020 May;7(3):224-227. doi: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000086. Epub 2020 May 1.

Abstract

In two studies, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men prostate cancer survivors report lower Gleason scores than heterosexual prostate cancer survivors, leading some to speculate that men who have sex with men may have more intensive screening than other men. In the largest study of men who have sex with men prostate cancer survivors to date, 23 of 193 (11.9%) men who have sex with men prostate cancer survivors reported low Gleason scores (2-5). We contacted 14 of them, a 61 percent response rate. At second interview, most men clarified that they reported only a partial score rather than the sum score. We conclude the average lower score is not a result of differences in screening but likely measurement error. A revised Gleason item question is provided to overcome this research artifact.

摘要

在两项研究中,男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性前列腺癌幸存者报告的Gleason评分低于异性恋前列腺癌幸存者,这使得一些人推测,与男性发生性行为的男性可能比其他男性接受了更密集的筛查。在迄今为止针对与男性发生性行为的男性前列腺癌幸存者的最大规模研究中,193名与男性发生性行为的男性前列腺癌幸存者中有23人(11.9%)报告了低Gleason评分(2 - 5分)。我们联系了其中14人,回复率为61%。在第二次访谈中,大多数男性澄清说他们报告的只是部分评分而非总分。我们得出结论,平均较低的评分不是筛查差异的结果,而可能是测量误差。提供了一个修订后的Gleason项目问题以克服这一研究假象。

相似文献

1
The Reliability of Self-Reported Gleason Scores in Studies of Sexual Minority Prostate Cancer Survivors.
Urol Pract. 2020 May;7(3):224-227. doi: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000086. Epub 2020 May 1.
3
The Influence of Companion Animals on Quality of Life of Gay and Bisexual Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 13;16(22):4457. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224457.
4
Sex After Prostate Cancer in Gay and Bisexual Men: A Review of the Literature.
Sex Med Rev. 2020 Jul;8(3):466-472. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Gay and Bisexual Prostate Cancer Survivors.
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 13;12:833197. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833197. eCollection 2022.
7
The Sexual Functioning of Gay and Bisexual Men Following Prostate Cancer Treatment: Results from the Restore Study.
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Jul;49(5):1589-1600. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1360-y. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
Association Between Sexual Orientation and Lifetime Prevalence of Skin Cancer in the United States.
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Apr 1;156(4):441-445. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4196.
9
Differences in Ideal Cardiovascular Health Between Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adults.
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Apr 1;8(4):335-346. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5660.
10
The Experiences of Gay and Bisexual Men Post-Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Nov;12(6):2076-2088. doi: 10.1177/1557988318793785. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

2
What Gay and Bisexual Men Treated for Prostate Cancer Want in a Sexual Rehabilitation Program: Results of the Needs Assessment.
Urol Pract. 2018 May;5(3):192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
3
The Sexual Functioning of Gay and Bisexual Men Following Prostate Cancer Treatment: Results from the Restore Study.
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Jul;49(5):1589-1600. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1360-y. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Diagnostic and outcome differences between heterosexual and nonheterosexual men treated for prostate cancer.
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):565-71. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
5
Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.
Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
6
Sexual orientation and testing for prostate and colorectal cancers among men in California.
Med Care. 2008 Dec;46(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d697f.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验