Three-year outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Comparison of a restrictive versus a liberal strategy for pacemaker implantation.

BACKGROUND

Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are common, heterogeneous, and frequently result in permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). Pacemaker therapy with a high rate of right ventricular pacing is associated with heart failure, hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare medium-term outcomes between PPI implantation strategies, as choosing the right indication for PPI is still an area of uncertainty and information on outcomes of PPI regimens beyond 1 year is rare.

METHODS

We compared outcomes after 3 years between a restrictive PPI strategy, in which the lowest threshold for PPI was left bundle branch block (LBBB) (QRS >120 ms) with the presence of new atrioventricular block (PQ >200 ms), and a liberal PPI regimen, in which PPI already was performed in patients with new-onset LBBB.

RESULTS

Between January 2014 and December 2016, TAVI was performed in 884 patients at our center. Of these, 383 consecutive, pacemaker-naive patients underwent TAVI with the liberal PPI strategy and subsequently 384 with the restrictive strategy. The restrictive strategy significantly reduced the percentage of patients undergoing PPI before discharge (17.2% vs 38.1%; P <.001). The incidence of the primary endpoint (all-cause-mortality and hospitalization for heart failure) after 3 years was similar in both groups (30.7% vs 35.2%; P = .242), as was all-cause-mortality (26.6% vs 29.2%; P = .718). Overall, patients who required PPI post-TAVI had significantly more hospitalizations due to heart failure (14.8% vs 7.8%; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

A restrictive PPI strategy after TAVI reduces PPI significantly and is safe in medium-term follow-up over 3 years.