Public Health Collaborating Unit, School of Health Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK
Public Health Collaborating Unit, School of Health Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 17;11(8):e050398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050398.
An evaluation of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to explore attitudes and sentiment towards the film including, for a subsample of professionals, associations between attitudes and personal experience of ACEs.
Mixed-method exploratory design.
Professionals and the general public.
A short online survey with 239 professionals. Interaction and user sentiment towards with the film on social media (Twitter, YouTube).
Survey: participants' attitudes towards the film including feelings invoked, learning gained and ACE count prevalence. Twitter user and YouTube viewer sentiment (positive, negative or neutral) and interaction (likes, retweets or comments) with the film.
Attitudes to the film were positive: 94.1% and 93.7%, respectively, agreed that it provided a helpful explanation of ACEs and trusted that the film was credible. Of those who reported ACE exposure, 88.9% agreed that those with ACEs would benefit from watching the film. Despite 50.6% reporting that the film had made them feel sad or upset, the majority (66.4%) reported they found the film hopeful or encouraging. Across 358 publicly available tweets from 313 users, 39.1% of tweets expressed positive sentiment, with only 1.4% negative (59.5% neutral). However, there was no association between tweet sentiment and interaction. Thirteen YouTube versions of the film received 171 812 views, 97.3% (n=889/914) ratings were positive (ie, 'thumbs up').
Despite being emotionally arousing, many professionals reflected positive impacts of the film including a perceived increased ability to discuss ACEs. Public sentiment demonstrated a positive reaction to and acceptability of the film. Understanding the professional and public response to materials developed to increase ACE awareness, such as the film explored here, is important given the growing number of international movements which seek to increase ACE awareness, prevent ACEs and mitigate their lifelong negative effects.
评估一部关于不良童年经历(ACEs)的动画短片,以探讨人们对这部电影的态度和感受,包括对 ACEs 的个人经历,以及专业人士对这部电影的态度之间的关联。
混合方法探索性设计。
专业人士和公众。
对 239 名专业人士进行了简短的在线调查。社交媒体(Twitter、YouTube)上对电影的互动和用户评价。
调查:参与者对电影的态度,包括唤起的感觉、获得的知识和 ACE 计数的普遍性。Twitter 用户和 YouTube 观众对电影的评价(正面、负面或中性)以及与电影的互动(点赞、转发或评论)。
电影的态度是积极的:分别有 94.1%和 93.7%的人认为它提供了对 ACEs 的有益解释,并相信这部电影是可信的。在报告 ACE 暴露的人中,88.9%的人认为有 ACE 的人会从观看这部电影中受益。尽管 50.6%的人表示这部电影让他们感到悲伤或不安,但大多数人(66.4%)表示他们觉得这部电影充满希望或鼓舞人心。在 313 名用户的 358 条公开推文上,39.1%的推文表达了积极的情绪,只有 1.4%是负面的(59.5%是中性的)。然而,推文的情绪和互动之间没有关联。该电影的 13 个 YouTube 版本共获得 171812 次观看,97.3%(n=889/914)的评分是正面的(即“点赞”)。
尽管这部电影引起了情感共鸣,但许多专业人士反映出他们对这部电影的积极影响,包括认为他们能够更有能力讨论 ACEs。公众对这部电影的反应是积极的,并且接受这部电影。了解专业人士和公众对旨在提高 ACE 意识的材料的反应,例如这里探讨的电影,是很重要的,因为越来越多的国际运动都在寻求提高 ACE 意识,预防 ACEs 并减轻其对终身的负面影响。