Ayesha Mulla S, Suryanarayanan Trichur S, Nataraja Karaba N, Prasad Siddegowda Rajendra, Shaanker Ramanan Uma
Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Vivekananda Institute of Tropical Mycology, Ramakrishna Mission Vidyapith, Chennai, India.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Aug 2;12:654512. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.654512. eCollection 2021.
Pre-sowing seed treatment with systemic fungicides is a firmly entrenched practice for most agricultural crops worldwide. The treatment is intended to protect the crop against seed- and soil-borne diseases. In recent years, there is increasing evidence that fungicidal applications to manage diseases might inadvertently also affect non-target organisms, such as endophytes. Endophytes are ubiquitously present in plants and contribute to plant growth and development besides offering resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. In seeds, endophytes may play a role in seed development, seed germination, seedling establishment and crop performance. In this paper, we review the recent literature on non-target effects of fungicidal applications on endophytic fungal community and discuss the possible consequences of indiscriminate seed treatment with systemic fungicide on seed endophytes. It is now well recognized that endophytes are ubiquitously present in all parts of the plant, including the seeds. They may be transmitted vertically from seed to seed as in many grasses and/or acquired horizontally from the soil and the environment. Though the origins and evolution of these organisms in plants are a matter of conjecture, numerous studies have shown that they symbiotically aid in plant growth and development, in nutrient acquisition as well in protecting the plants from abiotic and biotic stresses. Against this background, it is reasonable to assume that the use of systemic fungicides in seed treatment may not only affect the seed endophytes but also their attendant benefits to seedling growth and establishment. While there is evidence to indicate that fungicidal applications to manage plant diseases also affect foliar endophytes, there are only few studies that have documented the effect of seed treatment on seed-borne endophytes. Some of the convincing examples of the latter come from studies on the effect of fungicide application on rye grass seed endophyte AR37. More recently, experiments have shown that removal of seed endophytes by treatment with systemic fungicides leads to significant loss of seedling vigour and that such losses could be partially restored by enriching the seedlings with the lost endophytes. Put together, these studies reinforce the importance of seed endophytes to seedling growth and establishment and draw attention on how to trade the balance between the benefits of seed treatments and the direct and indirect costs incurred due to loss of endophytes. Among several approaches, use of reduced-risk fungicides and identifying fungicide-resistant endophytes are suggested to sustain the endophyte contribution to early seedling growth.
用内吸性杀菌剂进行播前种子处理是全球大多数农作物长期以来根深蒂固的做法。这种处理旨在保护作物免受种传和土传病害的侵害。近年来,越来越多的证据表明,用于防治病害的杀菌剂应用可能也会无意中影响非靶标生物,如内生菌。内生菌普遍存在于植物中,除了提供对生物和非生物胁迫的抗性外,还对植物的生长和发育有贡献。在种子中,内生菌可能在种子发育、种子萌发、幼苗建立和作物表现中发挥作用。在本文中,我们综述了关于杀菌剂应用对内生真菌群落的非靶标效应的最新文献,并讨论了用内吸性杀菌剂进行不加区分的种子处理对种子内生菌可能产生的后果。现在人们已经充分认识到,内生菌普遍存在于植物的所有部位,包括种子。它们可能像在许多禾本科植物中那样从种子垂直传播到种子,和/或从土壤和环境中水平获得。尽管这些植物体内生物的起源和进化仍是一个推测的问题,但大量研究表明,它们以共生方式帮助植物生长和发育、获取养分以及保护植物免受非生物和生物胁迫。在此背景下,有理由认为在种子处理中使用内吸性杀菌剂不仅可能影响种子内生菌,还可能影响它们对幼苗生长和建立的附带益处。虽然有证据表明用于防治植物病害的杀菌剂应用也会影响叶内生菌,但只有少数研究记录了种子处理对种传内生菌的影响。后者一些有说服力的例子来自关于杀菌剂应用对黑麦草种子内生菌AR37影响的研究。最近,实验表明用内吸性杀菌剂处理去除种子内生菌会导致幼苗活力显著丧失,并且通过用失去的内生菌富集幼苗可以部分恢复这种损失。综合来看,这些研究强化了种子内生菌对幼苗生长和建立的重要性,并引起人们对如何权衡种子处理的益处与因内生菌丧失而产生的直接和间接成本之间平衡的关注。在几种方法中,建议使用低风险杀菌剂和鉴定抗杀菌剂的内生菌,以维持内生菌对幼苗早期生长的贡献。