Natanzon Sharon Shalom, Fardman Alexander, Chernomordik Fernando, Mazin Israel, Herscovici Romana, Goitein Orly, Ben-Zekry Sagit, Younis Anan, Grupper Avishay, Matetzky Shlomi, Beigel Roy
Cardiovascular Division, Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and Department of Cardiology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Cardiovascular Imaging Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Heart Vessels. 2022 Mar;37(3):489-495. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01924-w. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with right ventricular (RV) involvement are a heterogenous group who mandate further risk stratification. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the PE severity index (PESI) for predicting adverse clinical outcomes among PE patients with RV involvement. Consecutive normotensive PE patients with RV involvement were allocated according to admission PESI score (PESI ≤ III vs. PESI ≥ IV). The primary outcome included hemodynamic instability and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as mechanical ventilation, thrombolytic therapy, acute kidney injury, and major bleeding. Multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the independent association between the PESI score and primary outcome. C-Statistic was used to compare the PESI with the BOVA score. A total of 253 patients were evaluated: 95 (38%) with a PESI ≥ IV. Of them, 82 (32%) patients were classified as intermediate-low risk and 171 (68%) as intermediate-high risk. Fifty (20%) patients had at least 1 adverse event. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the PESI to be an independent predictor for the primary outcome (HR 4.81, CI 95%, 1.15-20.09, p = 0.031), which was increased with a concomitant increase of the PESI score (PESI I 4.2%, PESI II 3.4%, PESI III 12%, PESI IV 16.3%, PESI V 23.1%, p for trend < 0.001). C-Statistic analysis for the PESI score yielded an AUC-0.746 (0.637-0.854), p = 0.001, compared to the BOVA score: AUC-0.679 (0.584-0.775), p = 0.011. PESI score was found to predict adverse outcomes among normotensive PE patients with RV involvement.
右心室(RV)受累的肺栓塞(PE)患者是一个异质性群体,需要进一步进行风险分层。我们的目的是评估肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)在预测右心室受累的PE患者不良临床结局方面的有效性。根据入院时的PESI评分(PESI≤III vs. PESI≥IV)对连续的血压正常且右心室受累的PE患者进行分组。主要结局包括血流动力学不稳定和住院死亡率。次要结局包括主要结局的各个组成部分以及机械通气、溶栓治疗、急性肾损伤和大出血。采用多变量逻辑回归模型评估PESI评分与主要结局之间的独立关联。使用C统计量将PESI与BOVA评分进行比较。共评估了253例患者:95例(38%)PESI≥IV。其中,82例(32%)患者被分类为中低风险,171例(68%)为中高风险。50例(20%)患者至少发生1次不良事件。多变量分析表明,PESI是主要结局的独立预测因子(HR 4.81,95%CI,1.15 - 20.09,p = 0.031),随着PESI评分的升高而增加(PESI I为4.2%,PESI II为3.4%,PESI III为12%,PESI IV为16.3%,PESI V为23.1%,趋势p < 0.001)。PESI评分的C统计量分析得出AUC为0.746(0.637 - 0.854),p = 0.001,与BOVA评分相比:AUC为0.679(0.584 - 0.775),p = 0.011。发现PESI评分可预测血压正常且右心室受累的PE患者的不良结局。