Wang Yang, Wu Junqi, Deng Jiajun, She Yunlang, Chen Chang
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul;13(7):4301-4310. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-543.
The detection value of different types of specimens for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression remains controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the detection value of biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens for PD-L1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
PubMed and Web of Science were searched prior to December 2020 to identify studies that compared the detection value of biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens for PD-L1 expression in NSCLC. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 scale was used to evaluate the quality of the literature included. The detection value of different types of specimens for PD-L1 expression was then assessed. Besides, the relative risk (RR) with 95% CI were pooled using Review Manager 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software.
The meta-analysis involved 12 articles and included 877 patients. There was no significant difference in the detection rate of PD-L1 at the 1% cutoff between biopsy specimens and surgical resection specimens (RR =0.89, 95% CI: 0.70-1.12, P=0.33). However, there was a significant difference between two groups when the cutoff is 50% (RR =0.69, 95% CI: 0.58-0.83, P<0.01). In addition, a subgroup analysis of the type of biopsy specimens and the PD-L1 qualitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays showed that the detection rate of PD-L1 in small biopsies and using the SP142 antibody were lower than in surgical specimens and using other antibodies for both the 1% and 50% cut-offs (P<0.01).
Current evidence suggests that caution must be taken when using biopsy specimens from patients with advanced NSCLC to evaluate PD-L1 status eligible for immunotherapy, additional biopsy specimens sampling may be needed to minimize the risk of tumor misclassification. In addition, PD-L1 qualitative IHC assays and the type of biopsy specimens related to PD-L1 expression detection.
不同类型标本用于程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)表达的检测价值仍存在争议。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是比较活检标本和手术切除标本对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者PD-L1表达的检测价值。
检索截至2020年12月的PubMed和Web of Science,以确定比较活检标本和手术切除标本对NSCLC患者PD-L1表达检测价值的研究。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)-2量表评估纳入文献的质量。然后评估不同类型标本对PD-L1表达的检测价值。此外,使用Review Manager 5.3软件和Stata 14.0软件汇总95%CI的相对风险(RR)。
该荟萃分析纳入12篇文章,共877例患者。活检标本和手术切除标本在1%临界值时PD-L1的检测率无显著差异(RR =0.89,95%CI:0.70-1.12,P=0.33)。然而,当临界值为50%时,两组之间存在显著差异(RR =0.69,95%CI:0.58-0.83,P<0.01)。此外,对活检标本类型和PD-L1定性免疫组织化学(IHC)检测方法的亚组分析表明,在1%和50%临界值时,小活检标本和使用SP142抗体时PD-L1的检测率均低于手术标本和使用其他抗体时(P<0.01)。
目前的证据表明,在使用晚期NSCLC患者的活检标本评估适合免疫治疗的PD-L1状态时必须谨慎,可能需要额外的活检标本采样以尽量减少肿瘤错误分类的风险。此外,PD-L1定性IHC检测方法和活检标本类型与PD-L1表达检测有关。