College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Aug;20(4):593-599. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001152.
Advance care planning is vital for ensuring individuals receive end-of-life care that is consistent with their care preferences and improves patient quality of life and satisfaction with care; however, only 11% of Americans have discussed advance care planning with a healthcare provider. Individuals with limited health literacy are even less likely to participate in advance care planning due to difficulty comprehending complex health information. The purpose of this review was to identify randomized controlled trials designed to address the effects of limited health literacy on advance care planning, evaluate the quality of these studies, and summarize evaluation data to inform future studies.
This systematic review examined randomized controlled trials published from January 1997 to July 2020 using the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases. Data were extracted and two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool.
The database search yielded 253 studies and five studies were included in the final review. Studies were conducted in mostly White patients in outpatient clinics in the United States. Researchers wrote text at lower reading levels, added images to materials, and created videos to enhance communication. Health literacy interventions increased participant knowledge, preference for comfort care, engagement, and care documentation; however, several methodological issues were identified, including baseline differences in treatment and control groups, issues with blinding, lack of valid and reliable outcome measures, and inappropriate statistical analyses.
More high-quality intervention studies that address the effects of limited health literacy on advance care planning in diverse populations and settings are needed. Future intervention studies should use reliable and valid instruments to measure advance care planning outcomes. Clinicians should use materials appropriate for their patients' health literacy levels to address their advance care planning needs.
预先医疗照护计划对于确保患者获得与其照护偏好一致并能提高患者生活质量和对护理满意度的临终关怀至关重要;然而,仅有 11%的美国人曾与医疗服务提供者讨论过预先医疗照护计划。由于难以理解复杂的健康信息,健康素养有限的个体参与预先医疗照护计划的可能性更低。本综述旨在确定旨在解决健康素养有限对预先医疗照护计划影响的随机对照试验,评估这些研究的质量,并总结评估数据以为未来的研究提供信息。
本系统综述使用 PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Scopus 数据库,检索了 1997 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月发表的随机对照试验。数据提取后,两名审查员使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所循证卫生保健中心的批判性评估工具独立评估研究质量。
数据库搜索共产生了 253 项研究,最终有 5 项研究纳入综述。这些研究主要在美国门诊的以白人患者为对象进行,研究人员撰写了阅读水平较低的文本,在材料中添加了图像,并制作了视频以增强沟通。健康素养干预措施提高了参与者的知识、对舒适护理的偏好、参与度和护理记录,但也发现了几个方法学问题,包括治疗组和对照组在基线时的差异、盲法问题、缺乏有效和可靠的结果测量指标以及不适当的统计分析。
需要更多高质量的干预研究来解决健康素养有限对不同人群和环境下预先医疗照护计划的影响。未来的干预研究应使用可靠和有效的工具来测量预先医疗照护计划的结果。临床医生应使用适合患者健康素养水平的材料来满足他们的预先医疗照护计划需求。