Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Lancet Haematol. 2021 Sep;8(9):e648-e657. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00195-2.
Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission is the current standard treatment in fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma. In this long-term follow-up study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of autologous HSCT versus interferon alfa maintenance after chemotherapy without or with rituximab in patients with primary advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma.
We did a post-hoc, long-term analysis of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 121 participating hospitals or practices across six European countries. Patients who were aged 18-65 years with previously untreated stage III-IV mantle cell lymphoma and an ECOG performance score of 0-2 were eligible for participation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either myeloablative radiochemotherapy (fractionated total body irradiation with 12 Gy/day 6-4 days before autologous HSCT and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg per day intravenously 3-2 days before autologous HSCT) followed by autologous HSCT (the autologous HSCT group) or interferon alfa maintenance (the interferon alfa maintenance group; 6 × 10 IU three times a week subcutaneously until progression) after completion of CHOP-like induction therapy (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m intravenously on day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m intravenously on day 1, vincristine 1·4 mg/m [maximum 2 mg] intravenously on day 1, and prednisone 100 mg/m orally on days 1-5; repeated every 21 days for up to 6 cycles) without or with rituximab (375 mg/m intravenously on day 0 or 1 of each cycle; R-CHOP). The primary outcome was progression-free survival from end of induction until progression or death among patients who had a remission and the secondary outcome was overall survival from the end of induction until death from any cause. We did comparisons of progression-free survival and overall survival according to the intention-to-treat principle between both groups among responding patients and explored efficacy in subgroups according to induction treatment without or with rituximab. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for the mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI) numerical score, and in the total group also for rituximab use (adjusted HR [aHR]). This trial was started before preregistration was implemented and is therefore not registered, recruitment is closed, and this is the final evaluation.
Between Sept 30, 1996, and July 1, 2004, 269 patients were randomly assigned to receive either autologous HSCT or interferon alfa maintenance therapy. The median follow-up was 14 years (IQR 10-16), with the intention-to-treat population consisting of 174 patients (93 [53%] in the autologous HSCT group and 81 [47%] in the interferon alfa maintenance group) who responded to induction therapy. The median age was 55 years (IQR 47-60), and R-CHOP was used in 68 (39%) of 174 patients. The median progression-free survival was 3·3 years (95% CI 2·5-4·3) in the autologous HSCT group versus 1·5 years (1·2-2·0) in the interferon alfa maintenance group (log-rank p<0·0001; aHR 0·50 [95% CI 0·36-0·69]). The median overall survival was 7·5 years (95% CI 5·7-12·0) in the autologous HSCT group versus 4·8 years (4·0-6·6) in the interferon alfa maintenance group (log-rank p=0·019; aHR 0·66 [95% CI 0·46-0·95]). For patients treated without rituximab, the progression-free survival adjusted HR for autologous HSCT versus interferon alfa was 0·40 (0·26-0·61), in comparison to 0·72 (0·42-1·24) for patients treated with rituximab. For overall survival, the adjusted hazard ratio for HSCT versus interferon alfa was 0·52 (0·33-0·82) without rituximab and 1·05 (0·55-1·99) for patients who received rituximab.
Our results confirm the long-term efficacy of autologous HSCT to treat mantle cell lymphoma established in the pre-rituximab era. The suggested reduced efficacy after immunochemotherapy supports the need for its re-evaluation now that antibody maintenance, high-dose cytarabine, and targeted treatments have changed the standard of care for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Deutsche Krebshilfe, the European Community, and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome.
自体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)在缓解期是套细胞淋巴瘤患者的标准治疗方法。在这项长期随访研究中,我们旨在评估在无或有利妥昔单抗的情况下,化疗后自体 HSCT 与干扰素α维持治疗在原发性晚期套细胞淋巴瘤患者中的疗效。
我们对在六个欧洲国家的 121 家参与医院或诊所进行的一项开放标签、多中心、随机、3 期试验进行了事后、长期分析。年龄在 18-65 岁之间、未经治疗的 III-IV 期套细胞淋巴瘤和 ECOG 表现评分为 0-2 的患者有资格参加。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受全身照射与环磷酰胺联合的清髓性放化疗(12 Gy/天,共 6-4 天,在自体 HSCT 前,环磷酰胺 60 mg/kg/天,在自体 HSCT 前 3-2 天),然后进行自体 HSCT(自体 HSCT 组)或干扰素α维持治疗(干扰素α维持组;6×10 IU,每周三次皮下注射,直到进展),完成 CHOP 样诱导治疗(环磷酰胺 750 mg/m2,第 1 天静脉注射,阿霉素 50 mg/m2,第 1 天静脉注射,长春新碱 1.4 mg/m[最大 2 mg],第 1 天静脉注射,泼尼松 100 mg/m2,第 1-5 天口服;每 21 天重复一次,最多 6 个周期),无或有利妥昔单抗(在每个周期的第 0 或 1 天静脉注射 375 mg/m2;R-CHOP)。主要终点是缓解患者的无进展生存期,从诱导结束到进展或死亡;次要终点是从诱导结束到任何原因死亡的总生存期。我们根据意向治疗原则比较了两组患者的无进展生存期和总生存期,并根据有无利妥昔单抗的诱导治疗对疗效进行了亚组分析。风险比(HRs)根据套细胞淋巴瘤国际预后指数(MIPI)数值评分进行调整,在总组中还根据利妥昔单抗的使用情况进行调整(调整后的 HR[aHR])。该试验在预注册实施之前开始,因此未进行注册,目前已停止招募,这是最终评估。
1996 年 9 月 30 日至 2004 年 7 月 1 日期间,269 名患者被随机分配接受自体 HSCT 或干扰素α维持治疗。中位随访时间为 14 年(IQR 10-16),意向治疗人群包括 174 名对诱导治疗有反应的患者(93[53%]名在自体 HSCT 组,81[47%]名在干扰素α维持组)。中位年龄为 55 岁(IQR 47-60),68(39%)名患者接受了 R-CHOP 治疗。自体 HSCT 组的中位无进展生存期为 3.3 年(95%CI 2.5-4.3),干扰素α维持组为 1.5 年(1.2-2.0)(对数秩检验,p<0.0001;aHR 0.50[95%CI 0.36-0.69])。自体 HSCT 组的中位总生存期为 7.5 年(95%CI 5.7-12.0),干扰素α维持组为 4.8 年(4.0-6.6)(对数秩检验,p=0.019;aHR 0.66[95%CI 0.46-0.95])。对于未接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者,与干扰素α相比,自体 HSCT 的无进展生存调整后的 HR 为 0.40(0.26-0.61),而接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者为 0.72(0.42-1.24)。对于总生存期,与干扰素α相比,HSCT 的调整后的危险比为 0.52(0.33-0.82),而未接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者为 1.05(0.55-1.99)。
我们的结果证实了自体 HSCT 在套细胞淋巴瘤治疗中的长期疗效,这在利妥昔单抗时代之前就已经确立。免疫化学治疗后的疗效降低提示需要重新评估其疗效,因为抗体维持、高剂量阿糖胞苷和靶向治疗已经改变了套细胞淋巴瘤患者的标准治疗方法。
德国癌症援助协会、欧洲共同体和德国联邦教育与研究部,恶性淋巴瘤网络。