Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy.
Division of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy -
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2023 Feb;71(1):120-125. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.21.05685-4. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
When performing a conventional CEA it is recommended the use of patch angioplasty (PA), since previous meta-analyses have shown PA to be superior to primary closure (PRC) in terms of stroke and restenosis rates. Different materials patches can be employed although none of them has been proved to be superior. Although autologous veins are potentially more resistant to immediate thrombosis as well as infection, cons may be represented by patch rupture and late dilatation. Aim of this study is to evaluate immediate and long-term results of CEA with saphenous vein patch angioplasty (SVPA) in a single-center experience.
A retrospective study was performed analyzing all patients undergoing CEA with SVPA at our institution from January 2012 to March 2020. CEA was performed in symptomatic patients with 50-99% carotid stenosis degree or asymptomatic patients with 70-99% stenosis degree. Exclusion criteria were critical limb ischemia, varicose disease, unavailability of saphenous veins, vein diameter <3.5 mm. All CEAs were performed under general anesthesia with routine shunting. Primary endpoints were perioperative stroke, death, carotid thrombosis and hematoma requiring surgery rates. Secondary endpoints included the rate of recurrent stenosis >70%, patch aneurysm/rupture/infection at follow-up.
Overall, 488 interventions were performed on 461 patients. Most patients were male (77.8%) with a mean age of 71.2±8.3 years. Thirty-day mortality and stroke rates were 0.4% and 1.2% respectively. Carotid thrombosis occurred in five patients (1%). Five patients (1%) developed a surgical site hematoma requiring surgical drainage. At a mean follow-up of 34.4±25.8 months 12 restenoses (2.5%) were detected. Five-year freedom from restenosis rate was 96.7%. Restenosis at follow-up was more frequent in patients who had contralateral carotid stenosis (P=0.019). Two patients (0.4%) developed carotid patch aneurysmal degeneration at a mean follow-up of 78.7 months. No infection nor patch disruption were detected.
CEA with SVPA resulted safe and effective in terms of early and late results. The perioperative complications rates we recorded were quite similar to those reported by other larger reviews and meta-analyses.
在进行常规颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)时,建议使用补片血管成形术(PA),因为之前的荟萃分析表明,PA 在卒中和再狭窄率方面优于直接缝合(PRC)。可以使用不同的补片材料,但没有一种被证明是优越的。尽管自体静脉更能抵抗即刻血栓形成和感染,但缺点可能是补片破裂和晚期扩张。本研究的目的是评估在单中心经验中使用大隐静脉补片血管成形术(SVPA)进行 CEA 的即刻和长期结果。
对 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间在我院行 SVPA 的所有患者进行回顾性研究。CEA 适用于 50-99%颈动脉狭窄程度的有症状患者或 70-99%狭窄程度的无症状患者。排除标准为严重肢体缺血、静脉曲张、大隐静脉不可用、静脉直径<3.5mm。所有 CEA 均在全身麻醉下常规分流下进行。主要终点为围手术期卒中、死亡、颈动脉血栓形成和需要手术治疗的血肿发生率。次要终点包括随访时再狭窄率>70%、补片动脉瘤/破裂/感染的发生率。
总体而言,488 例患者接受了 461 例干预。大多数患者为男性(77.8%),平均年龄为 71.2±8.3 岁。30 天死亡率和卒中率分别为 0.4%和 1.2%。5 例(1%)患者发生颈动脉血栓形成。5 例(1%)患者发生手术部位血肿,需要手术引流。在平均 34.4±25.8 个月的随访中,发现 12 例(2.5%)再狭窄。5 年再狭窄无复发率为 96.7%。在随访时有对侧颈动脉狭窄的患者,再狭窄更常见(P=0.019)。2 例(0.4%)患者在平均 78.7 个月的随访中发生颈动脉补片动脉瘤样变性。未发现感染或补片破裂。
SVPA 联合 CEA 在早期和晚期结果方面是安全有效的。我们记录的围手术期并发症发生率与其他更大的综述和荟萃分析报道的发生率相当。