Booth Lauren D, Sick-Samuels Anna C, Milstone Aaron M, Fackler James C, Gnazzo Lindsey K, Stockwell David C
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Aug 26;6(5):e463. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000463. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
Accurate assessment of infection in critically ill patients is vital to their care. Both indiscretion and under-utilization of diagnostic microbiology testing can contribute to inappropriate antibiotic administration or delays in diagnosis. However, indiscretion in diagnostic microbiology cultures may also lead to unnecessary tests that, if false-positive, would incur additional costs and unhelpful evaluations. This quality improvement project objective was to assess pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) clinicians' attitudes and practices around the microbiology work-up for patients with new-onset fever.
We developed and conducted a self-administered electronic survey of PICU clinicians at a single institution. The survey included 7 common clinical vignettes of PICU patients with new-onset fever and asked participants whether they would obtain central line blood cultures, peripheral blood cultures, respiratory aspirate cultures, cerebrospinal fluid cultures, urine cultures, and/or urinalyses.
Forty-seven of 54 clinicians (87%) completed the survey. Diagnostic specimen ordering practices were notably heterogeneous. Respondents unanimously favored a decision-support algorithm to guide culture specimen ordering practices for PICU patients with fever (100%, N = 47). A majority (91.5%, N = 43) indicated that a decision-support algorithm would be a means to align PICU and consulting care teams when ordering culture specimens for patients with fever.
This survey revealed variability of diagnostic specimen ordering practices for patients with new fever, supporting an opportunity to standardize practices. Clinicians favored a decision-support tool and thought that it would help align patient management between clinical team members. The results will be used to inform future diagnostic stewardship efforts.
准确评估重症患者的感染情况对其治疗至关重要。诊断性微生物检测的不当操作和未充分利用都可能导致抗生素使用不当或诊断延误。然而,诊断性微生物培养的不当操作也可能导致不必要的检测,如果结果为假阳性,将产生额外费用并进行无意义的评估。本质量改进项目的目标是评估儿科重症监护病房(PICU)临床医生对新发发热患者微生物检查的态度和做法。
我们开发并对一家机构的PICU临床医生进行了一项自行填写的电子调查。该调查包括7个PICU新发发热患者的常见临床病例,并询问参与者是否会进行中心静脉血培养、外周血培养、呼吸道吸出物培养、脑脊液培养、尿培养和/或尿液分析。
54名临床医生中有47名(87%)完成了调查。诊断标本的订购做法明显存在差异。受访者一致赞成采用决策支持算法来指导PICU发热患者的培养标本订购做法(100%,N = 47)。大多数人(91.5%,N = 43)表示,决策支持算法将是在为发热患者订购培养标本时使PICU和会诊护理团队保持一致的一种手段。
本次调查揭示了新发发热患者诊断标本订购做法的变异性,这表明有机会规范操作。临床医生赞成使用决策支持工具,并认为它将有助于临床团队成员之间的患者管理保持一致。研究结果将用于为未来的诊断管理工作提供参考。