Suppr超能文献

衡量人道主义环境中基于性别的暴力风险缓解情况:全面文献综述和系统制图的结果。

Measuring gender-based violence risk mitigation in humanitarian settings: results from a comprehensive desk review and systematic mapping.

机构信息

Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 8;11(9):e050887. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050887.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To systematically document measurement approaches used in the monitoring and evaluation of gender-based violence (GBV) risk mitigation activities, categorise the types of available literature produced by sector, identify existing tools and measures and identify knowledge gaps within the humanitarian sector.

DESIGN

Systematic mapping and in-depth review.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, Global Health, PsychInfo, ReliefWeb, OpenGrey (grey literature), Google Scholar, Web of Science (Social Science Index)Eligibility criteria: a structured search strategy was systematically applied to 17 databases as well as registers, websites and other resources to identify materials published between 1 January 2005 and 15 May 2019.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Those resources that met the inclusion criteria underwent a comprehensive full-text review. A detailed matrix was developed and key data from each resource were extracted to allow for the assessment of patterns in thematic areas.

RESULTS

A total of 2108 documents were screened. Overall, 145 documents and 112 tools were reviewed, representing 10 different humanitarian sectors. While numerous resources exist, many lack sufficient information on how to monitor outputs or outcomes of GBV risk mitigation activities. There is also limited guidance on how to integrate the measurement of GBV risk mitigation into existing monitoring and evaluation frameworks. Those reports that aimed to measure GBV risk mitigation activities mostly employed qualitative methods and few measured the impact of a GBV risk mitigation with robust research designs.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent efforts to adapt humanitarian response to COVID-19 have highlighted new and existing challenges for GBV risk mitigation. There is a significant gap in the evidence base around the effectiveness of GBV risk mitigation across all sectors. Understanding and strengthening measurement approaches in GBV risk mitigation remains a critical task for humanitarian response.

摘要

目的

系统记录监测和评估基于性别的暴力(GBV)风险缓解活动中使用的测量方法,对可用文献进行分类,确定各部门现有的工具和措施,并确定人道主义部门内的知识空白。

设计

系统制图和深入审查。

资料来源

Pubmed、全球健康、心理信息、救济网、OpenGrey(灰色文献)、谷歌学术、Web of Science(社会科学索引)

入选标准

系统地应用了结构化搜索策略,对 17 个数据库以及注册处、网站和其他资源进行了搜索,以确定 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 5 月 15 日期间发表的材料。

资料提取和综合

符合入选标准的资源进行了全面的全文审查。制定了详细的矩阵,并从每个资源中提取了关键数据,以便评估主题领域的模式。

结果

共筛选出 2108 篇文献。总体而言,审查了 145 份文件和 112 种工具,代表了 10 个不同的人道主义部门。虽然有许多资源,但许多资源缺乏关于如何监测基于性别的暴力风险缓解活动的产出或结果的足够信息。关于如何将基于性别的暴力风险缓解的测量纳入现有监测和评估框架也没有太多指导。那些旨在衡量基于性别的暴力风险缓解活动的报告大多采用定性方法,很少有使用稳健研究设计来衡量基于性别的暴力风险缓解的影响。

结论

最近为适应 COVID-19 而调整人道主义应对措施的努力凸显了所有部门衡量基于性别的暴力风险缓解效果的新的和现有的挑战。所有部门衡量基于性别的暴力风险缓解效果的证据基础都存在重大差距。了解和加强基于性别的暴力风险缓解的衡量方法仍然是人道主义应对的关键任务。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验