Suppr超能文献

聚合物渗透陶瓷网络和氧化锆增强硅酸锂修复体的使用寿命:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Longevity of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Banh William, Hughes Jared, Sia Aaron, Chien David C H, Tadakamadla Santosh K, Figueredo Carlos M, Ahmed Khaled E

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;14(17):5058. doi: 10.3390/ma14175058.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the existing literature to assess the clinical survival and success of PICN and ZLS indirect restorations as the clinical evidence for them remains lacking. PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACs, and SciElo databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 1 February 2021. Clinical trials and cohort studies published in English were included while case studies, case series, and in vitro studies were excluded. Results were analyzed qualitatively and a meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed. A strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT) analysis was conducted and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane RoB tools. An electronic search through the databases yielded 2454 articles, of which 825 remained after duplicate removal. Five studies investigating PICN and four investigating ZLS indirect restorations remained after assessing for eligibility. The overall survival rate of PICN over 1 year was 99.6% and 99.2% over 2 years. The overall survival rate of ZLS over 1 year was 99%. The main mode of failure for both materials was catastrophic fracture. One study had a high RoB, four had a moderate RoB, and four had a low RoB. Both materials demonstrated moderate strength of recommendation at a level 2 evidence for all studies based on SORT analysis. PICN and ZLS show promising short-term clinical performance as full and partial coverage indirect restorations, but longer follow-up studies are required to confirm their long-term performance.

摘要

本研究的目的是系统回顾现有文献,以评估预成间接复合树脂核(PICN)和ZLS间接修复体的临床生存率和成功率,因为目前仍缺乏关于它们的临床证据。检索了2000年1月1日至2021年2月1日期间的PubMed、SCOPUS、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区健康科学数据库(LILACs)和科学电子在线数据库(SciElo)。纳入以英文发表的临床试验和队列研究,排除病例研究、病例系列和体外研究。对结果进行定性分析,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。进行了推荐强度分类法(SORT)分析,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。通过数据库进行的电子检索共获得2454篇文章,去除重复后还剩825篇。在评估纳入标准后,有5项研究调查PICN,4项研究调查ZLS间接修复体。PICN 1年的总生存率为99.6%,2年为99.2%。ZLS 1年的总生存率为99%。两种材料的主要失败方式均为灾难性骨折。1项研究有高偏倚风险,4项有中度偏倚风险,4项有低偏倚风险。根据SORT分析,所有研究中两种材料均显示基于2级证据的推荐强度为中等。PICN和ZLS作为全冠和部分覆盖间接修复体显示出良好的短期临床性能,但需要更长时间的随访研究来确认其长期性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f96/8434158/5ef7849d9785/materials-14-05058-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验