Suppr超能文献

《裂唇婴儿观察结局量表(iCOO):一种新的针对口面裂婴儿和幼儿的结局评估工具》。

Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO): A New Outcome for Infants and Young Children with Orofacial Clefts.

机构信息

7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Oct;59(10):1233-1245. doi: 10.1177/10556656211040307. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the measurement properties for item and domain scores of the Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional (before lip surgery) and longitudinal study (preoperative baseline and 2 days and 2 months after lip surgery).

SETTING

Three academic craniofacial centers and national online advertisements.

PARTICIPANTS

Primary caregivers with an infant with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL  ±  P) scheduled to undergo primary lip repair. There were 133 primary caregivers at baseline, 115 at 2 days postsurgery, and 112 at 2 months postsurgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Caregiver observation items ( = 61) and global impression of health and function items ( = 8) across eight health domains.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 6.0 months (range 2.7-11.8 months). Five of eight iCOO domains have scale scores, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.67 to 0.87. Except for the Facial Skin and Mouth domain, iCOO scales had acceptable intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.76 to 0.84. The internal consistency of the Global Impression items across all domains was 0.90 and had acceptable ICCs (range 0.76-0.91). Sixteen out of 20 (nonscale) items had acceptable ICCs (range 0.66-0.96). As anticipated, iCOO scores 2 days postoperatively were generally lower than baseline and scores 2 months postsurgery were consistent with baseline or higher. The iCOO took approximately 10 min to complete.

CONCLUSIONS

The iCOO meets measurement standards and may be used for assessing the impact of cleft-related treatments in clinical research and care. More research is needed on its use in various treatment contexts.

摘要

目的

我们评估了裂唇婴儿观察结局量表(iCOO)项目和领域评分的测量特性。

设计

横断面(唇裂术前)和纵向研究(术前基线及唇裂修复术后 2 天和 2 个月)。

设置

三家学术颅面中心和全国在线广告。

参与者

计划行初次唇裂修复术的裂唇伴或不伴腭裂婴儿(CL±P)的主要照顾者。基线时共有 133 名主要照顾者,术后 2 天有 115 名,术后 2 个月有 112 名。

主要结局测量指标

8 个健康领域的 caregiver observation items(61 项)和 global impression of health and function items(8 项)。

结果

手术时平均年龄为 6.0 个月(范围 2.7-11.8 个月)。除了面部皮肤和口腔领域外,iCOO 量表的 8 个领域中有 5 个领域具有量表评分,Cronbach's alpha 值在 0.67-0.87 之间。除了面部皮肤和口腔领域外,iCOO 量表的内部一致性较好,ICC 范围为 0.76-0.84。所有领域的 Global Impression 项目的内部一致性为 0.90,ICC 也较好(范围 0.76-0.91)。20 项非量表项目中有 16 项的 ICC 较好(范围 0.66-0.96)。预期的是,iCOO 术后 2 天的评分普遍低于基线,术后 2 个月的评分与基线或更高。完成 iCOO 大约需要 10 分钟。

结论

iCOO 符合测量标准,可用于评估临床研究和护理中与裂唇相关治疗的影响。需要更多关于其在各种治疗环境中使用的研究。

相似文献

1
Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO): A New Outcome for Infants and Young Children with Orofacial Clefts.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Oct;59(10):1233-1245. doi: 10.1177/10556656211040307. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
2
Exploration of Caregiver Interrater Agreement and Test-Retest Reliability on the Infant Cleft Observer Outcomes (iCOO).
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Aug;60(8):1032-1040. doi: 10.1177/10556656221089155. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Observations by Caregivers Using the Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO): A Comparison of Three Versus Seven-day Daily Diaries.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Sep;61(9):1538-1542. doi: 10.1177/10556656231175290. Epub 2023 May 15.
4
Caregiver Observations of Infant Well-Being Before and After Cleft Lip Surgery.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Feb;61(2):271-283. doi: 10.1177/10556656221125371. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Development of an Outcome Measure of Observable Signs of Health and Well-Being in Infants With Orofacial Clefts.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Nov;57(11):1266-1279. doi: 10.1177/1055665620922105. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
National Estimates of and Risk Factors for Inpatient Revision Surgeries for Orofacial Clefts.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Jan;54(1):60-69. doi: 10.1597/15-206. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Oral Habits in Children With Orofacial Clefts: A Comparative Study.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Aug;58(8):984-989. doi: 10.1177/1055665620969570. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Facial morphometrics of children with non-syndromic orofacial clefts in Tanzania.
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jul 29;14:93. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-93.
9
Parent Observations of the Health Status of Infants With Clefts of the Lip: Results From Qualitative Interviews.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 May;56(5):646-657. doi: 10.1177/1055665618793062. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental Risk for Infants with Cleft Lip with or Without Cleft Palate Based on Caregiver-Proxy Reports.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 May;62(5):786-800. doi: 10.1177/10556656231225304. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
2
Observations by Caregivers Using the Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO): A Comparison of Three Versus Seven-day Daily Diaries.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Sep;61(9):1538-1542. doi: 10.1177/10556656231175290. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Caregiver Observations of Infant Well-Being Before and After Cleft Lip Surgery.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Feb;61(2):271-283. doi: 10.1177/10556656221125371. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Exploration of Caregiver Interrater Agreement and Test-Retest Reliability on the Infant Cleft Observer Outcomes (iCOO).
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Aug;60(8):1032-1040. doi: 10.1177/10556656221089155. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an Outcome Measure of Observable Signs of Health and Well-Being in Infants With Orofacial Clefts.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Nov;57(11):1266-1279. doi: 10.1177/1055665620922105. Epub 2020 May 29.
2
NAM Therapy-Evidence-Based Results.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Apr;57(4):529-531. doi: 10.1177/1055665619899752. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014.
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1420-1435. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1589. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Systematic Review of Symptom Assessment Measures for Use in Measurement-Based Care of Bipolar Disorders.
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 May 1;70(5):396-408. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800383. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Early Weight Gain in Infants With Cleft Lip and Palate Treated With and Without Nasoalveolar Molding: A Retrospective Study.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Aug;56(7):902-907. doi: 10.1177/1055665618815396. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Parent Observations of the Health Status of Infants With Clefts of the Lip: Results From Qualitative Interviews.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 May;56(5):646-657. doi: 10.1177/1055665618793062. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
9
Psychometric evaluation of a caregiver diary for the assessment of symptoms of respiratory syncytial virus.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0036-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Initial development and pilot testing of observer-reported outcomes (ObsROs) for children with cystic fibrosis ages 0-11years.
J Cyst Fibros. 2018 Sep;17(5):680-686. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验